2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13233-016-4044-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interconnection of electrospun nanofibers via a post co-solvent treatment and its open pore size effect on pressure-retarded osmosis performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because fibre mat pore size and distribution appear to have a significant effect on mixing, future studies will look at optimizing pore size and distribution within the fibre-based micromixers. Several labs have reported methods for controlling the size, shape, and distribution of electrospun nanofibre pores, which could be used to examine the relationship between mat porosity and fluid mixing [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because fibre mat pore size and distribution appear to have a significant effect on mixing, future studies will look at optimizing pore size and distribution within the fibre-based micromixers. Several labs have reported methods for controlling the size, shape, and distribution of electrospun nanofibre pores, which could be used to examine the relationship between mat porosity and fluid mixing [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PRO the energy is generated while mixing two different salinity water called osmotic pressure gradient energy [14]. For PRO electrospun nanofibers prepared by a postcosolvent treatment were used by Park et al and generated power density [15]. In PRO process water impulsively permeated through the semipermeable membrane from the feed side into pressurized salty water due to chemical potential gradient across the membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A perusal of relevant literature reveals that structurally organized, nonwoven, and therapeutically active 3D nanofibers (Dhivya et al 2015;Sill and Von 2008) mimic the natural niche of the cells and display endless role in tissue engineering (Lin et al 2012), regeneration of cell growth (Khil et al 2003), and cell proliferation (Manea et al 2016;Tian et al 2015) by virtue of their marked surface area (Vasita and Katti 2006;Subbiah et al 2005), pronounced mechanical support (Huang et al 2004;Tan and Lim 2006), and mesh-like network (Wu et al 2015;Park et al 2016). The ability to upload numerous bioactive compounds (Lin et al 2012;Xiao et al 2010) into ultrafine fibrous architecture increases their potential for topical dressing materials and scaffolds (Nagesh et al 2014;Abbaspour et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%