2020
DOI: 10.5194/tc-2020-305
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interannual variability in Transpolar Drift ice thickness and potential impact of Atlantification

Abstract: Abstract. Changes in Arctic sea ice thickness are the result of complex interactions of the dynamic and variable ice cover with atmosphere and ocean. Most of the sea ice exits the Arctic Ocean through Fram Strait, which is why long-term measurements of ice thickness at the end of the Transpolar Drift provide insight into the integrated signals of thermodynamic and dynamic influences along the pathways of Arctic sea ice. We present an updated time series of extensive ice thickness surveys carried out at the end… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, pan-Arctic sea ice thickness observations from satellite laser altimetry (Petty et al, 2020), radar altimetry (Laxon et al, 2013) and Lband radiometry (Kaleschke et al, 2012) are only available for the winter months of October-April. Airborne electromagnetic (EM) sensors and moored upward-looking sonar (ULS) instruments have provided snapshots of the sea ice thickness distribution over limited areas and/or time periods (Haas and Howell, 2015;Belter et al, 2020Belter et al, , 2021. However, consistent pan-Arctic sea ice thickness observations remain elusive for the months of May-September when they would arguably be most valuable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, pan-Arctic sea ice thickness observations from satellite laser altimetry (Petty et al, 2020), radar altimetry (Laxon et al, 2013) and Lband radiometry (Kaleschke et al, 2012) are only available for the winter months of October-April. Airborne electromagnetic (EM) sensors and moored upward-looking sonar (ULS) instruments have provided snapshots of the sea ice thickness distribution over limited areas and/or time periods (Haas and Howell, 2015;Belter et al, 2020Belter et al, , 2021. However, consistent pan-Arctic sea ice thickness observations remain elusive for the months of May-September when they would arguably be most valuable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, sea ice has decreased both in extent (Stroeve & Notz, 2018) and thickness (Belter et al., 2020; Kwok, 2018). Numerical experiments revealed that in the 2000s, about half of the liquid freshwater content (LFWC) rise in the Beaufort Gyre (BG) could be ascribed to sea ice decline (through both the meltwater and modification of ocean surface stress and circulation) caused by atmospheric warming (Wang, Wekerle, Danilov, Koldunov, et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for a continuous dataset for ice tracking is clear (e.g. Pfirman et al 2004;Krumpen et al 2016;Williams et al 2016;Newton et al 2017;Mahoney et al 2019;Belter et al 2020). Such a dataset is also included in the Sea Ice Tracking Utility, made publicly available recently on the National Snow and Ice Data Center website (SITU, Campbell et al 2020), or the Alfred Wegener Institute ICETrack tool (Krumpen, 2018) -for educational, scientific and field expedition planning purposes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%