This paper focuses upon the purposes, prejudices, practices and contexts of those who teach education in all its forms within higher education and schools. It examines some of the difficulties and challenges those in education departments whose significant history is school teaching face in extending their own learning opportunities as part of their moral purposes as professionals engaged in the 'betterment' of education, and it will suggest routes for research which might contribute to their thinking and action and thus, ultimately, to the education of students and pupils. There are, of course, examples of tutors in higher education engaging in development through 'reflective practice' and of pre-service teacher education courses which are based upon notions of reflective practice. The purpose of this paper, however, is to examine the roles and responsibilities of teacher educators through an analysis of their historical, social and psychological contexts and, through this, to propose a particular partnership model of qualitative research and development which appears to 'fit' closely to purpose. This paper is an expression of my own values, which themselves have been and still are being fashioned and refined through processes of information, experience, reflection and interaction blended by historical, social and environmental influences-over which I do not claim to have entire control and which are not always rational. Indeed, the neutralisation of voice and the absence of the first person singular is seldom a feature of the qualitative studies which I shall propose (Eisner, 1991)-so it is biased and partial though it will be based upon considerable collected practical wisdom, and 'connoisseurship'. For these reasons, T will be used rather than pretending that the T is not involved in the values, ideas and experiences which stand behind the text. In this sense, then, the paper adopts the stance of active feminist scholarship:First, the author is explicit about the space in which she stands politically and theoretically, even as her stances are multiple, shifting, and mobile. Second, the text displays critical analyses of current social arrangements and their 0141-1926/95/030357-13 © 1995 C. W. Day ideological frames. And, third, the narrative reveals and invents disruptive images of what could be. (Fine, 1992, p. 221)