2015 International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ictis.2015.7232166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive multi-objective vehicle routing via GA-based dynamic programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…x i,j ∈ {0, 1}, i, j ∈ A (8) In this formulation, the objective is to minimize the total cost of transportation and c i,j represents cost of arc {i,j}. Formulas ( 2)- (3) show that each customer can be served only once and constraints (4)- (5) requires that each vehicle should start from the deport and end at the deport. Formula(6) states the update process of service amount of the vehicle, where u i represents accumulated service amount of the vehicle after it served customer i and q j indicates the demand of customer j.…”
Section: Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…x i,j ∈ {0, 1}, i, j ∈ A (8) In this formulation, the objective is to minimize the total cost of transportation and c i,j represents cost of arc {i,j}. Formulas ( 2)- (3) show that each customer can be served only once and constraints (4)- (5) requires that each vehicle should start from the deport and end at the deport. Formula(6) states the update process of service amount of the vehicle, where u i represents accumulated service amount of the vehicle after it served customer i and q j indicates the demand of customer j.…”
Section: Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly because the VRP has a simple basic structure [2] and broad practicality in realworld problems. The VRP variants have appeared in many fields of human life [3,4], especially in the logistic industry that is flourishing with the development of the globalization. Effective routing scheduling can save a lot of cost (generally ranging from 5% to 20%) [5], which is of great significance for improving distribution efficiency [1,[6][7][8][9] and increasing economic benefits of enterprises [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%