2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of sodium azide with triazine herbicides: Effect on sorption to soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, the no-antibiotic azide treatment resulted in the highest methane production rate, consistently 15.8% greater than its corresponding no-azide surrogate. While it is common practice to use sodium azide for establishing sterile microbiological conditions, there have been several studies reporting the limited efficacy of azide addition within environmental matrices such as anaerobic swine manure (Kolz et al, 2005a), soil-manure slurries (Ingerslev and Halling-Sorensen, 2001), and soil-organic contaminant systems (Baek et al, 2003;Chefetz et al, 2006;Goel et al, 2003;Ro et al, 1995). In particular, the findings by Baek et al (2003) regarding the insensitivity of gram-positive bacteria and their associated periplasmic bound nitrate reductase, appears relevant to our results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Surprisingly, the no-antibiotic azide treatment resulted in the highest methane production rate, consistently 15.8% greater than its corresponding no-azide surrogate. While it is common practice to use sodium azide for establishing sterile microbiological conditions, there have been several studies reporting the limited efficacy of azide addition within environmental matrices such as anaerobic swine manure (Kolz et al, 2005a), soil-manure slurries (Ingerslev and Halling-Sorensen, 2001), and soil-organic contaminant systems (Baek et al, 2003;Chefetz et al, 2006;Goel et al, 2003;Ro et al, 1995). In particular, the findings by Baek et al (2003) regarding the insensitivity of gram-positive bacteria and their associated periplasmic bound nitrate reductase, appears relevant to our results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Freundlich coefficients presented here are given to indicate that our sorption results can be modeled using the Freundlich equation, and to provide a relative comparison between our data and previous studies. However, as discussed in Bowman (1981) and elsewhere (Chen et al 1999;Gunasekara and Xing 2003;Chefetz et al 2006), it is not possible to directly compare K f values when values of N are not equal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The microbial activity was controlled by the addition of 0.01 mol L −1 NaN 3 as a bacterial inhibitor. Sodium azide is one of the most common compounds used to inhibit microbial activity (Maagd et al, 1998; Goel et al, 2003; Chefetz et al, 2006 and references therein). The azide ion, N 3 − , is a powerful reducing agent (E 0 = −3.1 V), which indicates that thermodynamically it would be completely consumed (producing nitrogen gas) (Lide, 2004) while reducing iron (III) to iron (II), sulfate to sulfite/sulfide, etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%