2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of an anticancer drug lomustine with single and double stranded DNA at physiological conditions analyzed by electrochemical and spectroscopic methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(39 reference statements)
2
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For a totally irreversible and an adsorption-controlled electrode process, the relationship between E p and scan rate n can be expressed by the Laviron's [23] equation: E p = E o À(RT)/(anF)ln(anF/RTk s )À(RT/anF)lnn, where a is the charge transfer coefficient, k s is the standard heterogeneous electron transfer rate constant, n is the number of electrons transferred, n is the scan rate, and E8 is the formal redox potential (other symbols have their usual meanings). Calculated standard heterogeneous elec- tron transfer rate constants were equal to 6.3 and 2.4 s À1 for LCT and LCT-dsDNA, respectively, and proven that dsDNA altered the electrochemical kinetics of LMT reduction [7,24]. As can be seen on Figure 6, no new voltammetric signals appeared after dsDNA-LCT interaction (the same situation was observed when LCT and LCT-dsDNA was examined with SWV).…”
Section: Voltammetric Studies Of Lct-dsdna Interactionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a totally irreversible and an adsorption-controlled electrode process, the relationship between E p and scan rate n can be expressed by the Laviron's [23] equation: E p = E o À(RT)/(anF)ln(anF/RTk s )À(RT/anF)lnn, where a is the charge transfer coefficient, k s is the standard heterogeneous electron transfer rate constant, n is the number of electrons transferred, n is the scan rate, and E8 is the formal redox potential (other symbols have their usual meanings). Calculated standard heterogeneous elec- tron transfer rate constants were equal to 6.3 and 2.4 s À1 for LCT and LCT-dsDNA, respectively, and proven that dsDNA altered the electrochemical kinetics of LMT reduction [7,24]. As can be seen on Figure 6, no new voltammetric signals appeared after dsDNA-LCT interaction (the same situation was observed when LCT and LCT-dsDNA was examined with SWV).…”
Section: Voltammetric Studies Of Lct-dsdna Interactionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Electrochemical techniques offer inexpensive methods for environmental analysis [1][2][3]. There are several methods for the investigation of interaction between DNA and organic compounds [4][5][6][7]. Modern electrochemical techniques represent a very useful tool for this purpose [8], and mercury [9], amalgam [2], and carbon [10] electrodes are most often applied in such experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,25 Spectroscopic techniques such as UV-vis absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy are being extensively employed in many studies to investigate changes in the physicochemical properties of small molecules in the presence of different biomolecules. 6,8,[26][27][28][29][30][31] These techniques are simple, accurate, highly sensitive, rapid, and convenient, and can often provide superior information compared with that obtained from many other complicated methods. Spectroscopic studies enable us to understand the modulations in the photophysical properties of the entrapped molecules, namely, fluorescence quantum yields, fluorescence lifetimes, radiative decay rates, non-radiative decay rates, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of st‐DNA or ct‐DNA, the redox peak current decreases with a negative shift of the oxidation peak potential, which indicates the formation of slowly diffusing VLB‐DNA complex. The shift in the peak potential of CV to more negative or positive values is attributed to the intercalation of VLB into the DNA double‐helix . We assume this intercalation masks the electroactive site (dihydroxyl‐9,10‐anthraquinone moiety) of VLB which result in a decrease of the free VLB concentration.…”
Section: Vlb‐dna Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%