2009
DOI: 10.1037/a0017734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between the prefrontal cortex and amygdala during delay discounting and reversal.

Abstract: Interactions between the prefrontal cortex and amygdala are thought to be critical for reward anticipation. Alterations in reward anticipation that lead to an inability to wait for rewards or a diminished capacity to change behavior when doing so would be optimal is often termed impulsivity and compulsivity, respectively. Distinct regions of the prefrontal cortex may support decreased impulsivity through self-control and decreased compulsivity through flexibility. However, both self-control and flexibility app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
110
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
110
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, key roles have been suggested for the OB (Wilson and Sullivan 1994;Linster et al 2001;Fletcher and Wilson 2003;Churchwell et al 2009), the entorhinal cortex (Xu and Wilson 2012), and the OFC MacDonald 2008;Churchwell et al 2009). Indeed, we showed previously that both the ascending and descending synaptic inputs to the PC, from the OB and OFC are enhanced 3 days after learning (Cohen et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, key roles have been suggested for the OB (Wilson and Sullivan 1994;Linster et al 2001;Fletcher and Wilson 2003;Churchwell et al 2009), the entorhinal cortex (Xu and Wilson 2012), and the OFC MacDonald 2008;Churchwell et al 2009). Indeed, we showed previously that both the ascending and descending synaptic inputs to the PC, from the OB and OFC are enhanced 3 days after learning (Cohen et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular relevance in the present context, nAChRs are present in many brain regions implicated in the modulation of impulsivity (e.g. the ventral tegmental area, striatum, nucleus accumbens, prefrontal cortex and amygdala; Aron et al 2004;Cardinal et al 2001;Christakou et al 2004;Churchwell et al 2009;Eagle et al 2008;Hariri et al 2006;Koob and Volkow 2010;Winstanley et al 2004). Extensive research on smokers suggests a strong association between nicotine dependence and impulsivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Children and adolescents with anxiety disorders exhibit less functional connectivity in amygdalar-ventrolateral prefrontal connections than controls (e.g., Monk et al, 2008), and adolescents with externalizing disorders exhibit less functional connectivity in striatal-anterior cingulate connections than controls (e.g., Shannon, Sauder, Beauchaine, & Gatzke-Kopp, 2009). Deficient top-down control of the amygdala by the medial PFC, and reduced functional connectivity between the amygdala and the orbitofrontal cortex, are implicated in emotional lability and deficient self-regulation (see Churchwell, Morris, Heurtelou, & Kesner, 2009;Hilt, Hanson, & Pollak, 2011). Among typically developing individuals, the PFC reaches peak volume around ages 10-11, with gradual reductions observed thereafter (see Lenroot & Giedd, 2006).…”
Section: Prefrontal Cortex Development Neural Plasticity and Emotiomentioning
confidence: 99%