2011
DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2011.558126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between snow, canopy, and vegetation in a boreal coniferous forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is less wind-distribution in 220 boreal forests than in the more open tundra, tree composition and density impact snow 221 distribution and depth through interception of snow by the canopy branches and subsequent 222 evaporation and sublimation. This results in lower snow inputs in dense forests and areas of 223 shallow snow underneath individual trees (Rasmus et al, 2011). This winter effect of tree 224 density on snow cover may, in part, explain the negative relationship found between larch stand 225 density and ground thaw (Webb et al, 2017) and is consistent with the effects of winter warming 226 experiments on summertime active layer dynamics (e.g.…”
Section: Vegetation Canopies During the Non-growing Season 190supporting
confidence: 66%
“…While there is less wind-distribution in 220 boreal forests than in the more open tundra, tree composition and density impact snow 221 distribution and depth through interception of snow by the canopy branches and subsequent 222 evaporation and sublimation. This results in lower snow inputs in dense forests and areas of 223 shallow snow underneath individual trees (Rasmus et al, 2011). This winter effect of tree 224 density on snow cover may, in part, explain the negative relationship found between larch stand 225 density and ground thaw (Webb et al, 2017) and is consistent with the effects of winter warming 226 experiments on summertime active layer dynamics (e.g.…”
Section: Vegetation Canopies During the Non-growing Season 190supporting
confidence: 66%
“…Snow cover manipulation experiments in arctic and alpine systems generally conWrm our Wndings concerning growth forms with forbs and dwarf shrubs increasing in abundance in response to added snow and late snow melt, whereas lichens and graminoid species show an opposite trend . Likewise, the highest covers of the dwarf shrubs Vaccinium myrtillus and V. vitis-idaea are observed on patches with naturally deep snow cover in an observation of a boreal forest in Finland (Rasmus et al 2011). The importance of snow cover for mosses has still not been well investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Frost damage in understory plants such as Vaccinium myrtillus, however, can strongly increase in mild winters due to reduced insulation, especially in misty and rainy conditions (Ögren 1996), and growth of this species depends on insulation by snow, especially in years with late spring frost events . Observations along natural snow depth gradients at small spatial scales in a boreal forest similar to our study site in terms of species composition indicate a strong inXuence of snow depth on the occurrence of understory plant species in a boreal forest (Rasmus et al 2011). In particular, Vaccinium myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and the dominant moss Hylocomium splendens prefer microsites with deep snow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Also, the snowpack insulates the underlying soil from winter cold air temperature, with implications for the ecosystem in terms of vegetation cover and dynamics (Rasmus et al, 2011;Grippa et al, 2005), litter decomposition (e.g., Saccone et al, 2013), or carbon cycling (e.g., Kelley et al, 1968). The representation of this insulation is one of the critical uncertainties of the modeling of the global soil carbon cycle and its evolution in permafrost environments (Lawrence and Slater, 2010;Gouttevin et al, 2012).…”
Section: Gouttevin Et Al: a Two-layer Canopy Model With Thermal Imentioning
confidence: 99%