Interactions between motion aftereffects and induced movement

Anstis, Stuart; Reinhardt-Rutland, Anthony

doi:10.1016/0042-6989(76)90157-7

Cited by 67 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This property is inconsistent with the static MAE (Mather et al, 1998; because no motion is perceived in surrounding regions during adaptation; previously reported phantom or relative MAEs involve overlapping adaptation and test regions, or at least perceived motion in the test region; cf. Anstis & Reinhardt-Rutland, 1976;Ashida, Susami, & Osaka, 1996;Bonnet & Pouthas, 1972;Swanston & Wade, 1992;Wade, Spillmann, & Swanston, 1996;Weisstein, Maguire, & Berbaum, 1977;Zaidi & Sachtler, 1991). But this property is consistent with the remote MAE found with dynamic test patterns (Culham et al, 2000;Snowden & Milne, 1997;von Grünau & Dubé, 1992).…”

Section: Relation To Dynamic and Static Maessupporting

confidence: 88%

Motion adaptation shifts apparent position without the motion aftereffect

Whitney

Cavanagh

2003

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Relation To Dynamic and Static Maessupporting

confidence: 88%

Motion adaptation shifts apparent position without the motion aftereffect

Whitney

Cavanagh

2003

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The value of linking induced movement to neural processes is strengthened by simultaneous motion-contrast effects, in which the involvement of neural processes of lateral inhibition appears plausible (e.g., Walker & Powell, 1974), and by aftereffects of induced movement (e.g., Anstis & Reinhardt-Rutland, 1976; Sensory and Neural Processes section). Neural properties varying with eccentricity and concerning, for example, receptive-field size (e.g., Humphrey, 1968) and velocity sensitivity (e.g., may be important.…”

Section: Distinction Between Induced Movement With and Withoutmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In at least some cases of induced movement, the best effects require inducing and induced stimuli to be at the same depth (e.g., Gogel & MacCracken, 1979 First, aftereffects of induced movement seem less readily elicited with linear induced movement; they required tracking eye movements in the only case reported up to now (Morgan, Ward, & Brussel, 1976; Aftereffects and Adaptation of Induced Movement section). Second, whereas induced rotation is readily observed during vection (Anstis & Reinhardt-Rutland, 1976), this is less clearly the case with linear induced movement (Rock et al, 1980; Alteration of the Observer's Perception of Space section). These points might be explained, however, by arguing that more motion-sensitive mechanisms are stimulated by inducing rotation and movement in depth than by linear inducing movement, in which mechanisms responsive to one direction alone are available.…”

Section: Distinction Between Induced Movement With and Withoutmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, he accepted the prevailing view that movement aftereffects can be explained by reference to movement-sensitive neural mechanisms. Because observation of induced movement can lead to aftereffects (e.g., Anstis & Reinhardt-Rutland, 1976; Aftereffects and Adaptation of Induced Movement section), it seems inconsistent to suppose that induced movement is to be explained exclusively in inferential terms.…”

Section: Felt and Canceled Eye Movementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Induced movement in the visual modality: An overview.

Reinhardt-Rutland¹

1988

Psychological Bulletin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Induced movement, illusory movement in a stationary stimulus resulting from adjoining movement, has received steady experimental investigation over the last 70 years or so. It is observed under different viewing conditions in a wide variety of displays that differ considerably in overall size and in form of inducing and induced stimuli. Explanations have been diverse, some being based on relations within the display and others invoking mediation by other aspects of the observer's perception. Probably, no one explanation can account for all forms of induced movement. Current knowledge about induced movement may have important implications for visual perception of object morion. Among possibly important factors is size of display, which can vary from two small spots (e.g., Carr & Hardy, 1920) to displays occupying most of the observer's visual field (e.g., Post, 1986).A second major purpose of this overview is to examine explanations for induced movement (Explanations section). Duncker's (1929Duncker's ( /1938 findings have had an important influence here, although many of his suggestions have subsequently been shown to require at least some modification. For example, his theory I thank J. Morss for reading an earlier version of this article, J. Ravey for translation, and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions.

show abstract

“…Sharpe et al did not attempt to explain the MAE contingent on spatial information in the frame, which was also reported by Potts and Harris (1975). However, Anstis and Reinhardt-Rutland (1976) have shown that motion aftereffects can be produced by induced motion (from a surround) and can themselves induce motion. If a component of motion perception is relative motion perception (i.e., the motion of a center relative to its surround), then it is possible to conclude that the frame-pattern contingent motion aftereffect is due to local interactions between motion and pattern information with the lateral interactions arising, in this case, within the nature of motion processing itself-that is, from the comparison of the relative motion signals of the inner and outer regions.…”

Section: Varieties Of Contingent Visual Aftereffectsmentioning

confidence: 93%

Visual aftereffect of texture density contingent on color of frame

Durgin

1996

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An aftereffect of perceived texture density contingent on the color of a surrounding region is reported. In a series of experiments, participants were adapted, with fixation, to stimuli in which the relative density of two achromatic texture regions was perfectly correlated with the color presented in a surrounding region. Following adaptation, the perceived relative density of the two regions was contingent on the color of the surrounding region or of the texture elements themselves. For example, if high density on the left was correlated with a blue surround during adaptation (and high density on the right with a yellow surround), then in order for the left and right textures to appear equal in the assessment phase, denser texture was required on the left in the presence of a blue surround (and denser texture on the right in the context of a yellow surround). Contingent aftereffects were found (1) with black-and-white scatter-dot textures, (2) with luminance-balanced textures, and (3) when the texture elements, rather than the surrounds, were colored during assessment. Effect size was decreased when the elements themselves were colored, but also when spatial subportions of the surround were used for the presentation of color. The effect may be mediated by retinal color spreading (Peppel, 1986)and appears consistent with a local associative account of contingent aftereffects, such as Barlow's (1990) model of modifIable inhibition.After adaptation to a dense texture localized in a specific region of the visual field, a visual aftereffect develops such that textures presented in that region will appear much less dense than when presented in another, nonadapted region (Anstis, 1974;Durgin & Proffitt, 1991). In the present paper I show that this aftereffect of texture density (not to be confused with spatial frequency) can be made contingent on color information presented in a spatially distinct (and otherwise untextured) region of the display. Previously, aftereffects both of motion (Potts & Harris, 1975) and ofcolor (Siegel, Allan, & Eissenberg, 1992) have been made contingent on information presented in a surrounding region orframe (color and texture in the former case and lightness in the latter). However, no framecontingent aftereffects have been reported in which the apparent spatial distribution ofluminance contrast is altered. Thus, the present study represents a unique demonstration of an aftereffect of spatial pattern contingent on information in the surround.It is often possible to make the perceptual distortion of one visual dimension contingent on the presence of another quite different dimension. For example, McCollough

show abstract

Interactions between motion aftereffects and induced movement

Cited by 67 publications

References 16 publications

Motion adaptation shifts apparent position without the motion aftereffect

Motion adaptation shifts apparent position without the motion aftereffect

Induced movement in the visual modality: An overview.

Visual aftereffect of texture density contingent on color of frame

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About