1996
DOI: 10.3758/bf03211876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual aftereffect of texture density contingent on color of frame

Abstract: An aftereffect of perceived texture density contingent on the color of a surrounding region is reported. In a series of experiments, participants were adapted, with fixation, to stimuli in which the relative density of two achromatic texture regions was perfectly correlated with the color presented in a surrounding region. Following adaptation, the perceived relative density of the two regions was contingent on the color of the surrounding region or of the texture elements themselves. For example, if high dens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(122 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barlow (1990) has argued that contingent aftereffects, in general, reflect a technique for efficient coding of sensory information by encoding only departures from normal correlations (see also Durgin 1996;Durgin and Proffitt 1996;Helson 1964). Other formulations of contingent aftereffects include the notion of error correction with respect to an internal standard (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barlow (1990) has argued that contingent aftereffects, in general, reflect a technique for efficient coding of sensory information by encoding only departures from normal correlations (see also Durgin 1996;Durgin and Proffitt 1996;Helson 1964). Other formulations of contingent aftereffects include the notion of error correction with respect to an internal standard (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For purposes of analysis, we considered the change in distance advanced as the logarithm of the ratio between measures after and before adaptation (cf. Durgin, 1996). Statistical analyses of aftereffect strength were therefore computed on differences of logarithms (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The McCollough effect is preserved in the absence of stimulation (Jones & Holding, 1975;MacKay & MacKay, 1975) and the form of decay can be modified to some extent by pre-and postinduction exposure to achromatic gratings (Skowbo, 1988). A third criticism is that, because there are many different types of contingent aftereffects, the number of such double-duty detectors would have to be prohibitively large (Harris, 1980; for review, see Durgin, 1996;Humphrey, 1998 Barlow, 1990Barlow, , 1997Humphrey, 1998;Savoy, 1984). In the case of the McCollough effect, mechanisms that code for color and separate achromatic systems that code for orientation would be involved.…”
Section: What Is ''Adapted'' During Induction Of the Mccollough Effect?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large literature that is concerned not only with the properties of such aftereffects, but also with what they may tell us, at a theoretical level, about the mechanisms of vision (for various proposals and reviews, see Barlow, 1990;Broerse & O'Shea, 1995;Dodwell & Humphrey, 1990;Durgin, 1996;Durgin & Proffitt, 1996;Harris, 1980;Humphrey, 1998;Siegel & Allan, 1993;Skowbo, Timney, Gentry, & Morant, 1975;Stromeyer, 1978). In this paper, most of our discussion will be devoted to the McCollough effect, the most commonly studied contingent aftereffect.…”
Section: The Mccollough Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a setting pervaded by local inhibitory interneurons a storage process that decreases the excitability of committed synapses will release a local neighborhood around storing tissue from the inhibitory influence that was exerted on that neighborhood by the activity of the storing tissue prior to its loss of excitability (Sachs, 1967). Such "marginal sensitization" effects can be seen fleetingly at the level of single cells even in primary sensory areas (Müller et al 1999) and with longer time-course in perception, notably in perceptual adaptation after-effects (see Durgin 1995, and references therein). At the level of permanent rather than temporary storage such sensitization would promote the progressive (and obligatory) sequential consumption of tissue for memory storage (see Section 3, above) by increasing the probability that tissue at the margins of storing tissue will be the next target of storage.…”
Section: D the Sparsity Of Cortical Connectivity And Cascade Convermentioning
confidence: 99%