2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra02963b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction rule and mechanism of perfluoroalkyl sulfonates containing different carbon chains with human serum albumin

Abstract: All three PFASs bind to HSA mainly through electrostatic forces and the toxicity decreases with the shortening of the carbon chain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the structure of hSA in complex with PFOA is wider and displays four bound molecules, the structure of hSA in complex with PFOS is more compact and includes only two bound ligands. Similarly to PFOAs, PFOSs occupy FA4 and FA6 pockets and their binding to hSA appear to be exothermic and driven by both polar and non‐polar interactions 34,35 . Yet, the orientations and positions exploited by PFOA and PFOS in FA4 and FA6 pockets differs significantly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the structure of hSA in complex with PFOA is wider and displays four bound molecules, the structure of hSA in complex with PFOS is more compact and includes only two bound ligands. Similarly to PFOAs, PFOSs occupy FA4 and FA6 pockets and their binding to hSA appear to be exothermic and driven by both polar and non‐polar interactions 34,35 . Yet, the orientations and positions exploited by PFOA and PFOS in FA4 and FA6 pockets differs significantly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to PFOAs, PFOSs occupy FA4 and FA6 pockets and their binding to hSA appear to be exothermic and driven by both polar and non-polar interactions. 34,35 Yet, the orientations and positions exploited by PFOA and PFOS in FA4 and FA6 pockets differs significantly. Finally, detailed structural analysis reveals that the greater binding affinity of PFOS toward hSA reported in literature 20,21 could be explained by the presence of an additional oxygen of sulfonate head-group of PFOS and its larger van der Waals volume, which ultimately facilitates the formation of a greater number of intermolecular interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that PFOS bound Der p1 with dissociation constant at equilibrium (K d ) = 224 nM, compared with albumin, K d = 80 nM, and the PFOS-liver fatty acid binding protein complex (K d = 2,099 nM) (46,47). In children with the highest serum concentrations of PFOS (207 nM), exposure to PFOS at nanomolar concentrations significantly inhibits human serum albumin and liver fatty acid binding protein in vitro (48,49). These results suggest that investigators should focus on the potency of PFOS and how it influences the allergenic effects of HDM in humans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…20 For instance, PFOA and PFOS affinity towards serum proteins such as albumin and haemoglobin was extensively characterised by multi-analytical approaches based on fluorescence spectroscopy, mass spectrometry (MS), circular dichroism, isothermal titration calorimetry, X-ray crystallography, and molecular docking. [21][22][23][24] Multi-analytical studies confirmed the strong affinity of PFOA for human serum albumin (hSA): PFOA's carboxylate head and fluorinated C8 tail mimic the structure of fatty acids promoting PFOA binding into hSA's hydrophobic pockets. 25,26 Similarly to fatty acids, hSA-PFOA interactions are non-covalent, mainly hydrophobic, and influenced by protein conformation and environmental conditions (such as pH).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%