1997
DOI: 10.1080/09540259721303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction Patterns of Mixed Sex Groups in Educational Computer Conferences. Part I-Empirical Findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
39
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing CMC and face to face environments, a general conclusion drawn from the literature was that females appear to be at less of a disadvantage in CMC than in face to face meetings (McConell, 1997). The findings about the quantity of participation, however, are contradictory.…”
Section: Computer Mediated Communicationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Comparing CMC and face to face environments, a general conclusion drawn from the literature was that females appear to be at less of a disadvantage in CMC than in face to face meetings (McConell, 1997). The findings about the quantity of participation, however, are contradictory.…”
Section: Computer Mediated Communicationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…All of these interpretations are consistent with past studies related to the positive effects of computermediated environment. Findings from studies such as Harasim (1987) and McConnell (1988McConnell ( , 1997 suggest that computer conferences allow for more participatory dynamics than face-to-face meetings. From a broader perspective, enthusiasts of CSCL and other computer-mediated communications advocate this as a democratizing force, because of the immediate accessibility each participant has to the myriad others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a broader perspective, enthusiasts of CSCL and other computer-mediated communications advocate this as a democratizing force, because of the immediate accessibility each participant has to the myriad others. Some researchers claim the use of the electronic medium can afford a more democratic process than face-to-face meetings for peer discussions, since each individual can have an equal opportunity to take part in online conversations without the many constraints of face-to-face settings (see, for example, Harasim, 1987and McConnell, 1988, 1997.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of 'being alone with one's terminal' may lead to a reduction of barriers and a relaxation of face-maintaining behaviour [18,[21][22][23][24]. McConnell [25] found that in a computer conferencing environment women are at less of a disadvantage than in face-to-face conversations. Garramone et al [18] conclude that the aloneness and the anonymity of CMC may encourage online users to connect more intimately to others in society.…”
Section: Anonymity Multiple Identities and Alonenessmentioning
confidence: 99%