The Insiders’ Perspectives: A Focus Group Study on Gender Issues in a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environment

Abstract

Executive SummaryThere is little doubt that the advent of collaborative technologies in recent years has brought some significant changes in the way students learn, communicate, and interact with one another. In recent years, this emergence has sparked increased interest for research into the role and impact of instructional technologies on group learning. Despite the widespread use of different instructional technologies to support teaching and learning in today's classroom, our understanding of these technologies and their underlying impacts on learners and instructors remains fragmented, specifically with regard to gender learning issues. One important area that has been neglected in the research is the impact of classroom technology on gender classroom equity and learning processes. Indeed, only a few studies have examined the gender learning issues inside the group learning process as it naturally occurs in an actual classroom. How do female students, as well as their instructors, perceive gender issues in their classroom? What are the experiences of female students in an online learning environment? Do technologies contribute to or hinder the achievement of gender classroom equity and positive learning experiences? These are some of the interesting but complex questions that this study attempted to explore. This paper presents a focus group study on the perspective and experiences of female management students and their instructors in an online learning environment that used a computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) system to facilitate student-to-student interactions. To explore the potential impact of a CSCL system on gender classroom equity, an interpretive field study was conducted to glean insights about the insider participants' experiences and perceptions. This study focused on both the female students and their instructors regarding their perceptions and experiences with the use of CSCL and their learning processes. Our research sites involved two graduate courses that used the computer supported collaborative learning in place of face-toface discussions at least part of the semester. Drawn from the field notes and the transcripts of the interviews taken at the end of the semester, findings are reported along with an interpretation of the results. By virtue of being involved in and close to the phenomenon, subtle aspects on gender equity issues were detected from the use of the CSCL. The study is also among the first empirical research that applies and extends the view of e-learning producMaterial published as part of this journal, either on-line or in print, is copyrighted by the publisher of the Journal of Information Technology Education. Permission to make digital or paper copy of part or all of these works for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage AND that copies 1) bear this notice in full and 2) give the full citation on the first page. It is permissible to abstract these works so long...

Reconsidering Motivational Supremacy of Postgraduate Students’ Ease of Use, Efficacy and Perceived Use of Power Point Technology for Learning

“…On hypothesis two, the finding is in line with the findings of Mitra, Lenzmeier, Avon, Qu and Hazen (2000) and Huynh, Lee and Schuldt (2005) based on their review on computers and the effect of gender on use of Computer Assisted instructional package of Anulobi (2009) and Yusuf and Afolabi (2010). The findings contradict the findings of Achuonye and Olele (2009) and Ofili (2015) which stressed the indicated male and female supremacy in computer usage and Ease of Use of PowerPoint.…”

“Gendered differences versus doing gender”: a systematic review on the role of gender in CSCL

“…They found that girls with no experience made significant gains in learning in a short period of time. Huynh et al (2005) and Ying et al's (2021) study had different results in this regard. When researching the motivation of mixed-gender CSCL pairs, they found women to report significantly higher stress levels, lower levels of perceived competence, and less perceived choice than men.…”

“…Others find that the scope of unconscious gender bias in STEM education became clear when observing that higher female participation did not automatically reduce differential treatment and stereotyped perception of women in CSCL learning experiences (Rambe 2017;Ying et al 2021). They further find that a deeply rooted gender bias still exists in the classroom today, and carries over to technology-supported learning environments in CSCL (Huynh et al 2005;Cintron et al 2019;Richterich 2019).…”

Effects of Computer Assisted Instruction in Nupe Language on Pupils’ Achievement in Mathematics in Bida Local Government Area of Niger State, Nigeria

“…This finding is in agreement with the finding of: Spotts et al (1997) Achuonye and Olele (2009) who noted that there is significant difference between males and females pupils exposed to CAI. Huynh et., al (2005) found that there is no statistical significant validating difference in the pattern of online interaction between males and females students. Also Yusuf and Afolabi (2010) Bello cited in Achuonye (2011) noted that gender has no influence on performance of males and females pupils exposed to CAI .These were however disapproved by the result of this study which showed that the male gender achieved better scores with CAIPNL than the female gender.…”