1995
DOI: 10.1021/la00007a034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Alkanes with Monolayers of Nonionic Surfactants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 In addition, several past studies have examined the penetration of oils into surfactant-laden interfaces. 39,40 These studies have provided detailed insights into the mixing of the oil with the surfactant-tail region of the interfaces, and suggest avenues for future studies that may provide additional insight into the interactions of lipids and LCs described in this paper. 39,40 Our results are also consistent with the proposition that the driving force for phase separation is a lower energy state of the homeotropically oriented film of LC: by concentrating the PEGlipid in PEG-lipid-rich domains, the composition of PEG-lipid within the remaining area of the interface is decreased sufficiently that the LC can adopt a homeotropic orientation.…”
Section: Discussion Of Mechanism Of Phase Separationmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38 In addition, several past studies have examined the penetration of oils into surfactant-laden interfaces. 39,40 These studies have provided detailed insights into the mixing of the oil with the surfactant-tail region of the interfaces, and suggest avenues for future studies that may provide additional insight into the interactions of lipids and LCs described in this paper. 39,40 Our results are also consistent with the proposition that the driving force for phase separation is a lower energy state of the homeotropically oriented film of LC: by concentrating the PEGlipid in PEG-lipid-rich domains, the composition of PEG-lipid within the remaining area of the interface is decreased sufficiently that the LC can adopt a homeotropic orientation.…”
Section: Discussion Of Mechanism Of Phase Separationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…39,40 These studies have provided detailed insights into the mixing of the oil with the surfactant-tail region of the interfaces, and suggest avenues for future studies that may provide additional insight into the interactions of lipids and LCs described in this paper. 39,40 Our results are also consistent with the proposition that the driving force for phase separation is a lower energy state of the homeotropically oriented film of LC: by concentrating the PEGlipid in PEG-lipid-rich domains, the composition of PEG-lipid within the remaining area of the interface is decreased sufficiently that the LC can adopt a homeotropic orientation. Several prior studies have established that elastic strain can lead to LC films that possess a lower energy when the LC assumes a homeotropic orientation at one interface as compared to a planar orientation.…”
Section: Discussion Of Mechanism Of Phase Separationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…18 Although PIT studies give only circumstantial evidence of oil penetration, they have been given added validity by fairly recent studies of Aveyard, Thomas, and co-workers. 19,20 These workers used a combination of surface tension measurements and neutron reflectivity studies to assess the penetration of hydrocarbon oils of varying chain lengths into surfactant monolayers at a planar air/water interface. 19,20 The results of their studies confirmed the conclusions from their PIT studies, in that there was oil penetration of the interfacial surfactant monolayer, with the extent of this penetration increasing with decreasing size of oil and increasing length of the surfactant hydrophobic moiety.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 These workers used a combination of surface tension measurements and neutron reflectivity studies to assess the penetration of hydrocarbon oils of varying chain lengths into surfactant monolayers at a planar air/water interface. 19,20 The results of their studies confirmed the conclusions from their PIT studies, in that there was oil penetration of the interfacial surfactant monolayer, with the extent of this penetration increasing with decreasing size of oil and increasing length of the surfactant hydrophobic moiety. It is important to note, however, that although these neutron reflectivity measurements confirm that oil penetration occurs, they do not give any reliable information about how varying the concentration of oil incorporated will alter the extent of penetration because the experiments so far performed have been carried out under conditions of oil saturation of the monolayer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 These results provide convincing evidence that the interaction of oils with the surfactant monolayer has important consequences for a wide range of phenomena, including microemulsion formation, 33 and that various physical processes can give rise to very low interfacial tension with the probability of oil spreading on the surface of the aqueous surfactant solution either as a continuous oil film over the surface or as discrete lenses. 34 The interfacial tension measurements of a series of experiments in which oil was admixed with a blend of surfactant and cosurfactant showed slight variability in lowering the interfacial tension by changing the surfactant/cosurfactant ratios where the interfacial tension approached almost 0 in both systems with ncentrations up to 30% oil. Furthermore, the variation of the Km ratio from 1.3:1 to 3:1 with the same oil resulted in a greater decrease in interfacial tension.…”
Section: Interfacial Tension Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%