Fourteenth International Seaweed Symposium 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-1998-6_43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction mechanisms between Gracilaria chilensis (Rhodophyta) and epiphytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
49
0
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
49
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…One is that, in normal farming conditions, the multispecies epiphytic assemblage includes components that may persist throughout the year and others that fluctuate seasonally. The types of epiphyte prevailing will determine the degree of negative effects on the farmed host (Buschmann & Go´mez, 1993;Pizarro & Santelices, 1993;Buschmann et al, 2001). Whereas the main pests for Gracilaria farming in the south of Chile are Polysiphoniatype epiphytes and tube-forming herbivorous polychaetes, crustacean grazers and fouling mussels (Retamales & Buschmann, 1996;Buschmann et al, 1997a, b;Buschmann et al, 2001), the studied farm in Caldera, in the north of Chile, was mainly affected by small sized epiphytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One is that, in normal farming conditions, the multispecies epiphytic assemblage includes components that may persist throughout the year and others that fluctuate seasonally. The types of epiphyte prevailing will determine the degree of negative effects on the farmed host (Buschmann & Go´mez, 1993;Pizarro & Santelices, 1993;Buschmann et al, 2001). Whereas the main pests for Gracilaria farming in the south of Chile are Polysiphoniatype epiphytes and tube-forming herbivorous polychaetes, crustacean grazers and fouling mussels (Retamales & Buschmann, 1996;Buschmann et al, 1997a, b;Buschmann et al, 2001), the studied farm in Caldera, in the north of Chile, was mainly affected by small sized epiphytes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions are known to make the host more susceptible to pests in general and to epiphytes in particular (Friedlander, 1992). Competition between hosts and their epiphytes has been demonstrated under natural and artificial conditions of growth (Arrontes, 1990;Friedlander & Ben-Amotz, 1991;Svirski et al, 1993), and the extent of the damage is clearly determined by the intensity of the infections (Cancino et al, 1987;Buschmann & Go´mez, 1993). Farming of Gracilaria chilensis is a clear example of how detrimental epiphytes may become (Kuschel & Buschmann, 1991;Pizarro & Santelices, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in sizes of the fronds could be related to the influence of the epiphytic algae over the growth and survival of the macroalgae substratum. Epiphytes may reduce the photosynthetic rates of the macroalgae and increase branch fragmentation (Buschmann and Gomez, 1993). As several species of filamentous epiphytic algae grow especially in the uppermost portion of the branches, they may promote the loss of those portions (Széchy and Paula, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, studies of Gracilaria sp. farming in Chile, which mainly focused on epiphytes (Buschmann & Gómez 1993, Fletcher 1995, Leonardi et al 2006) and kelp farming in Asia, with a focus on fouling hydroids and copepods (Park et al 1990, Park & Hwang 2012. However, due to the slower growth of the cultivation industry in Europe, research on associated epibionts has only begun more recently (Peteiro & Freire 2013b, Førde et al 2016, Walls et al 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%