2006
DOI: 10.1080/09670260600645659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity, phenomenology and epidemiology of epiphytism in farmedGracilaria chilensis(Rhodophyta) in northern Chile

Abstract: This study identified the most common epiphytes infecting the algal host Gracilaria chilensis on a farm in northern Chile. Simultaneously, the types of host-epiphyte interfaces were characterized and their relative abundance and temporal variability were monitored. Five types of anatomical relationships were detected. Infection type I included the epiphytes weakly attached to the surface of the host and not associated with damage of host tissues (i.e. Hincksia mitchelliae, H. granulosa and Ectocarpus acutus). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2l, o). This invasion type is consistent with that of an epitrophic fungus (Leonardi et al 2006;Linskens 1976). By 11 dpi, a hyphal network substantially covered and grown within the inoculated roots (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…2l, o). This invasion type is consistent with that of an epitrophic fungus (Leonardi et al 2006;Linskens 1976). By 11 dpi, a hyphal network substantially covered and grown within the inoculated roots (Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…For example, studies of Gracilaria sp. farming in Chile, which mainly focused on epiphytes (Buschmann & Gómez 1993, Fletcher 1995, Leonardi et al 2006) and kelp farming in Asia, with a focus on fouling hydroids and copepods (Park et al 1990, Park & Hwang 2012. However, due to the slower growth of the cultivation industry in Europe, research on associated epibionts has only begun more recently (Peteiro & Freire 2013b, Førde et al 2016, Walls et al 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing the thallus cross-sections of H. musciformis, it was observed that the epiphytic species of diatoms were weakly attached to the surface without damaging the thallus. Thus, this infection was characterized as type I (Leonardi et al, 2006) (Figure 1). However, S. subintegra was strongly adhered to the surface of H. musciformis thallus, but without invading the cortical cells, characterizing an infection of type II (Leonardi et al, 2006) (Figure 1) During the incubation time, the brown morpho of H. musciformis showed little infection by diatoms and rare red crusts of Sahlingia subintegra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this infection was characterized as type I (Leonardi et al, 2006) (Figure 1). However, S. subintegra was strongly adhered to the surface of H. musciformis thallus, but without invading the cortical cells, characterizing an infection of type II (Leonardi et al, 2006) (Figure 1) During the incubation time, the brown morpho of H. musciformis showed little infection by diatoms and rare red crusts of Sahlingia subintegra. In comparison, the green morpho had diatoms in larger quantities and numerous red crusts (S. subintegra), mainly in the basal portion of the explants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%