2003
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.67.193101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction-induced oscillations in correlated electron transport

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such two contributions always add with the same sign, for both repulsive (U 0 40) and attractive (U 0 o0) interactions, and generally are of the same order of magnitude. The bound-particle state thus behaves like a single particle hopping on the 1D lattice, but with a driving force which is doubled as compared with that of a single particle 18,19 and with a modified hopping rate k eff . Note that the effect of direct twoatom tunnelling on the BO dynamics, not considered in previous works 19,20,22 , is to increase the amplitude of the breathing motion (owing to the correction of k eff ), whereas the periodicity of the BO is preserved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such two contributions always add with the same sign, for both repulsive (U 0 40) and attractive (U 0 o0) interactions, and generally are of the same order of magnitude. The bound-particle state thus behaves like a single particle hopping on the 1D lattice, but with a driving force which is doubled as compared with that of a single particle 18,19 and with a modified hopping rate k eff . Note that the effect of direct twoatom tunnelling on the BO dynamics, not considered in previous works 19,20,22 , is to increase the amplitude of the breathing motion (owing to the correction of k eff ), whereas the periodicity of the BO is preserved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When interactions between particles compete with their mobility, novel dynamical behaviour can arise where particles form bound states 13 and co-tunnel through the lattice 14 . While particle interaction has been generally associated to BO damping [15][16][17] , for few strongly interacting particles it was predicted that bound states undergo fractional BO at a frequency twice (or multiple) that of single-particle BO [18][19][20] . The observation of fractional BO is challenging in condensed-matter systems and up to now has not been achieved even in model systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they can be partially transmitted across a sufficiently high potential barrier, despite a single particle can not. Such a correlation-induced KT is associated to the formation of a bound (molecular) particle state [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31], which behaves differently from the single particle state as it is scattered off by a potential barrier [31,32] or when an external field is applied [28,29,33,34,35,36]. We emphasize that, for the observation of correlation-induced KT, it is crucial that the particles exhibit long-range (nearestneighbor) interaction, with the existence of two minibands for the two-particle bound state.…”
Section: Send Offprint Requests Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wave packet approaches have been considered previously, but relied on strictly one-dimensional structures and/or on noninteracting electrons, or were based on approximate schemes such as the time-dependent Hartree-Fock theory. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Below, we study in detail the effect of Coulomb repulsion and an external electric field on wave packet propagation in a two-dimensional nanochannel. A main finding is that Coulomb repulsion redistributes the charge density to the channel walls, which makes electron transport more sensitive to perturbations at the interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to previous wave packet studies that mostly focused on single electrons and/or onedimensional nanostructures. [12][13][14][15][16] The present wave packet simulation may be extended in future studies to include, e.g., the electronic spin degree of freedom, small three-dimensional nanostructures, more than two interacting electrons and, though more challenging, the coupling to high-density source and drain contacts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%