2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41422-020-0332-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease

Abstract: The interplay between the commensal microbiota and the mammalian immune system development and function includes multifold interactions in homeostasis and disease. The microbiome plays critical roles in the training and development of major components of the host's innate and adaptive immune system, while the immune system orchestrates the maintenance of key features of host-microbe symbiosis. In a genetically susceptible host, imbalances in microbiota-immunity interactions under defined environmental contexts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
1,531
0
20

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,976 publications
(1,605 citation statements)
references
References 268 publications
6
1,531
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of dysregulation of the immune system such as increased Th1 activity can cause changes in the composition of the microbiota and otherwise. 24 Based on the results of this study, there were differences in the order of the microbiota phylum (Firmicutes and Actinobacteria) and genera (Micrococcus and Propionibacterium) composition in leprosy patients during treatment with and without reversal reaction. This result indicate the possibility of reversal reaction in uence on microbiome composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The existence of dysregulation of the immune system such as increased Th1 activity can cause changes in the composition of the microbiota and otherwise. 24 Based on the results of this study, there were differences in the order of the microbiota phylum (Firmicutes and Actinobacteria) and genera (Micrococcus and Propionibacterium) composition in leprosy patients during treatment with and without reversal reaction. This result indicate the possibility of reversal reaction in uence on microbiome composition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In our experience, the subjects who responded more favorably were characterized by lower degrees of mucosal damage at the time of FMT induction, as evidenced by lower endoscopic (UCEIS, 5.7 ± 2.1 vs. 8.3 ± 1.5 vs.) and histologic scores (Geboes, 2.5 ± 1.0 vs. 4.3 ± 0.1), as well as lower fecal calprotectin levels (335 ± 50 vs. 929 ± 1144 mcg/g). Immunomodulating effects of the gut microbiota are well-established [27,28] and, in the setting of gross and microscopic mucosal ulceration, FMT may induce uncontrolled and potentially damaging mucosal in ammation secondary to bacterial translocation and systemic immune activation [29,30]. Targeting of UC patients with mild to moderate disease for FMT may therefore be advantageous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mouse microbiome is yet another factor affecting the transferability of mouse models. Within recent years, more and more evidence has been collected, showing that the microbiome is an etiologic agent of certain diseases, such as metabolic disorders or inflammatory bowel disease, is implicated in normal human physiology and also interacts strongly with the immune system [ 62 , 128 , 129 , 130 ]. From an ecological point of view, the latter aspect is not surprising, since it is beneficial for both host and commensal to co-evolve toward mutualism and homeostasis.…”
Section: Implications Of Staphylococcal Host Adaptation For Murinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prerequisite for this is a finely tuned balance between the growth of commensal microorganisms and the prevention of their invasion of the body or overuse of resources, which is known as tolerance. The immune system ensures this under homeostatic conditions and is therefore both shaped and modulated by the microbiome throughout life, as comprehensively reviewed by Zheng et al [ 130 ]. As the microbiomes of mice and humans differ significantly, this also leads to immunological differences between the two species that affect the interaction with potential pathogens such as S. aureus [ 62 , 128 ].…”
Section: Implications Of Staphylococcal Host Adaptation For Murinementioning
confidence: 99%