2014
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction Between Hippocampus and Cerebellum Crus I in Sequence-Based but not Place-Based Navigation

Abstract: To examine the cerebellar contribution to human spatial navigation we used functional magnetic resonance imaging and virtual reality. Our findings show that the sensory-motor requirements of navigation induce activity in cerebellar lobules and cortical areas known to be involved in the motor loop and vestibular processing. By contrast, cognitive aspects of navigation mainly induce activity in a different cerebellar lobule (VIIA Crus I). Our results demonstrate a functional link between cerebellum and hippocamp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
132
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
8
132
1
Order By: Relevance
“…L left, R right, y SUIT coordinates (mm); Roman numerals indicate cerebellar lobules according to Schmahmann et al [36] of lobule VII) and the hippocampus have been found in the chicken [38]. Furthermore, functional connections between the posterolateral cerebellum (Crus I) and the hippocampus have been found in humans considering another function of the hippocampus, namely navigation [27]. In the present study, context-related activation during extinction was most prominent within Crus II bilaterally.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…L left, R right, y SUIT coordinates (mm); Roman numerals indicate cerebellar lobules according to Schmahmann et al [36] of lobule VII) and the hippocampus have been found in the chicken [38]. Furthermore, functional connections between the posterolateral cerebellum (Crus I) and the hippocampus have been found in humans considering another function of the hippocampus, namely navigation [27]. In the present study, context-related activation during extinction was most prominent within Crus II bilaterally.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Likewise, in the previous study examining cerebral activations in the present dataset, bilateral hippocampus showed increased activation during extinction learning in a novel context compared to a context identical to the acquisition context [21]. Both animal and human studies show that there are structural and functional connections between the cerebellum and the hippocampus [24][25][26][27]37]. In particular, direct anatomical connections between the lateral cerebellum (lobules VI-VIII; note that Crus I and II are parts Thresholded at p<0.01 (partially corrected by predetermined cluster size).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cerebellum was reported to be involved in predictions about sensory consequences of actions [105]. Furthermore, previous studies found evidence for the involvement of the Cerebellum in navigation [106]. It was reported that the caudate nucleus is also involved in navigation [107], especially during route following [108] and way finding [109].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, recent functional connectivity analyses using the crus I as a seed region found significant correlated activity between the crus I and the mPFC, the inferior parietal cortex, and the PCC (Krienen and Buckner, 2009; Wang et al, 2014). Further, crus I and II abnormalities have been associated with deficits in integrating and regulating emotional and cognitive functions (Igloi et al, 2014; Riva et al, 2013). As such, our findings are consistent with previous studies showing crus involvement in the spontaneous brain activity of the DMN (Krienen and Buckner, 2009; Wang et al, 2014), and weaker connectivity strength between the PCC and Crus I/II could underlie the cognitive and emotional deficits associated with cannabis use disorder and tobacco use disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%