PsycTESTS Dataset 2014
DOI: 10.1037/t59927-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction and Student Satisfaction Scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…English Studies course satisfaction was measured by four items adapted from Kuo et al (2014) who measured student satisfaction with online courses (Cronbach's α for the English Studies course satisfaction scale in the current study was 0.95; sample item: "Overall, I am satisfied with this class"). The students were required to respond to the items on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).…”
Section: The English Studies Course Satisfaction Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…English Studies course satisfaction was measured by four items adapted from Kuo et al (2014) who measured student satisfaction with online courses (Cronbach's α for the English Studies course satisfaction scale in the current study was 0.95; sample item: "Overall, I am satisfied with this class"). The students were required to respond to the items on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).…”
Section: The English Studies Course Satisfaction Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second scale is "Interaction and Student Satisfaction Scales". This scale is developed by Kuo, Belland, Schroder, and Walker (2014). The original form of this scale aims at measuring interaction and student satisfaction in a blended learning environment and consists of 32 items and 4 factors.…”
Section: Data Collection Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students satisfaction is a cornerstone and plays a crucial role in the success of online programs (Ku et al, 2014), representing students' cognitive achievement in the on-line learning (Eom, et al, 2006), and the success of the implementation of the on-line program (DeLone & McLean, 1992). Conversely, it was found that student satisfaction is negatively correlated with drop-out rates, while it is positively correlated with commitment levels to the program (Kuo et al, 2014;Eom et al, 2006). The literature has listed several studies that assess the satisfaction level of students in face-toface and online environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study reported that students' satisfaction with their learning experience was associated with the detailed feedback received from their instructors when participated in a partnership with other colleagues (Shea, Fredericksen, Pickett, & Pelz, 2003). It was suggested in many studies that students satisfaction on on-line learning could be predicted by many variables including motivation (Eom et al, 2006), self-efficacy (Shen et al, 2013), learning strategies (Kuo et al, 2014;, interaction (Eom et al, 2006;Croxton, 2014;, and instructors facilitation, knowledge, and feedback (Eom et al, 2006). Thus, what and how students learn in an online education is an important variable to understand in terms of their satisfaction which in turn would be of great help to course instructors and designers when creating a learning environment that fits students' needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%