2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-19814-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction Analysis as a Tool for Supporting Collaboration: An Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the simplex cross-sectional design being applied in this study may result in a common method bias ( Teo and Noyes, 2014 ). For instance, although previous research demonstrated that educational situation perception contributed to various positive achievement-relevant outcomes for students, such as higher academic performance, sense of learning achievement, stronger intrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy ( Jelfs and Whitelock, 2000 ; Kahrimanis et al, 2011 ; Blau et al, 2019 ), suggesting a pathway from educational situation perception to students’ online learning engagement; it is still possible that students’ demonstration of online learning engagement might be susceptible to multiple variables (e.g., individual attitude and motivation). Hence, it is suggested that future study adopt multilayered, multidimensional methods (e.g., the combination of cross-sectional design with longitudinal research) to enhance our understanding of the causality as far as possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the simplex cross-sectional design being applied in this study may result in a common method bias ( Teo and Noyes, 2014 ). For instance, although previous research demonstrated that educational situation perception contributed to various positive achievement-relevant outcomes for students, such as higher academic performance, sense of learning achievement, stronger intrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy ( Jelfs and Whitelock, 2000 ; Kahrimanis et al, 2011 ; Blau et al, 2019 ), suggesting a pathway from educational situation perception to students’ online learning engagement; it is still possible that students’ demonstration of online learning engagement might be susceptible to multiple variables (e.g., individual attitude and motivation). Hence, it is suggested that future study adopt multilayered, multidimensional methods (e.g., the combination of cross-sectional design with longitudinal research) to enhance our understanding of the causality as far as possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, participation characteristics differ from trust and reciprocal networks. While gifting and social trust form a social capital that the individual's volition can be readily changed, social participation, like collaboration, is operated by the participants' volition [58] and requires a prevenient interaction [59,60]. Unlike social trust and reciprocal networks according to individual volition, social participation is a collective characteristic that has a collective nature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scaffolding design is motivated by Wood et al's (1976) theory of scaffolding learning that advocates strategies for experts to facilitate learning of skills and knowledge that is initially beyond a student's zone of proximal development. While the theory was initially developed for training motor task skills in toddlers, scaffolding learning has been successfully applied to computer-supported collaborative learning contexts (Kahrimanis, Avouris, and Komis 2011). Here, we use the scaffolding design to enable formal learning of more advanced scientific concepts.…”
Section: System Designmentioning
confidence: 99%