Robotics: Science and Systems I 2005
DOI: 10.15607/rss.2005.i.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interacting Markov Random Fields for Simultaneous Terrain Modeling and Obstacle Detection

Abstract: Abstract-Autonomous navigation in outdoor environments with vegetation is difficult because available sensors make very indirect measurements on quantities of interest such as the supporting ground height and the location of obstacles. We introduce a terrain model that includes spatial constraints on these quantities to exploit structure found in outdoor domains and use available sensor data more effectively. The model consists of a latent variable that establishes a prior that favors vegetation of a similar h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adding such a neighborhood consistency assumption to our similarity classifier allows us to remove some of the noise inherent to the classifier. This closely parallels the smoothing assumption used to continually adjust the ground height estimate within the perception system to take into account both evidence from laser data as well as maintaining a degree of smoothness due to the continuity of the ground surface [28].…”
Section: Global Segment Smoothnessmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Adding such a neighborhood consistency assumption to our similarity classifier allows us to remove some of the noise inherent to the classifier. This closely parallels the smoothing assumption used to continually adjust the ground height estimate within the perception system to take into account both evidence from laser data as well as maintaining a degree of smoothness due to the continuity of the ground surface [28].…”
Section: Global Segment Smoothnessmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…One method that does relax this strong independence assumption is described by Wellington et al in [6]. Their system also performs terrain classification as well as some other estimation tasks about the terrain.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Neural networks would seem worthy of investigation for the three-dimensional (3D) LiDAR classification problem. Work has been done by other researchers on classifying aerial LiDAR data that generate elevation maps of limited resolution, 19,20 and some significant work has been done in the case of 3D LiDAR from a rover perspective 4,9,10,[21][22][23] and more specifically other types of classifiers such as Markov random fields, 24 Bayesian classifiers, 25 support vector machines (SVMs) 26 and fuzzy modelling. 11 Hata et al successfully use a neural network to do such classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%