2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2008
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2008.4543627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online, self-supervised terrain classification via discriminatively trained submodular Markov random fields

Abstract: , "Online, self-supervised terrain classification via discriminatively trained submodular Markov random fields", . May 2008.Online, self-supervised terrain classification via discriminatively trained submodular Markov random fields AbstractThe authors present a novel approach to the task of autonomous terrain classification based on structured prediction. We consider the problem of learning a classifier that will accurately segment an image into "obstacle" and "ground" patches based on supervised input. Previo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…learning terrain slippage (Angelova et al, 2006) and traversability (Angelova et al, 2007) to improve mobility or to avoid getting stuck, with human supervision and Bayesian estimates (Ollis et al, 2007), learning depth from monocular images (Saxena et al, 2007) or learning natural and man-made pathways from color and texture (Blas et al, 2008). Learning algorithms can also be used to extend stereo vision range with near-to-far learning, learning the long-range appearance of terrains and obstacles using color features (Albus et al, 2006) with Markov random fields (Vernaza et al, 2008), with suitable features and a linear support vector machine (Bajracharya et al, 2008), or using reverse optical flow (Lookingbill et al, 2007). Typically trained off-line, features can also be learned online to provide a continuous adaptability (Grudic et al, 2007).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…learning terrain slippage (Angelova et al, 2006) and traversability (Angelova et al, 2007) to improve mobility or to avoid getting stuck, with human supervision and Bayesian estimates (Ollis et al, 2007), learning depth from monocular images (Saxena et al, 2007) or learning natural and man-made pathways from color and texture (Blas et al, 2008). Learning algorithms can also be used to extend stereo vision range with near-to-far learning, learning the long-range appearance of terrains and obstacles using color features (Albus et al, 2006) with Markov random fields (Vernaza et al, 2008), with suitable features and a linear support vector machine (Bajracharya et al, 2008), or using reverse optical flow (Lookingbill et al, 2007). Typically trained off-line, features can also be learned online to provide a continuous adaptability (Grudic et al, 2007).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have addressed the problem of representing texture information in terms of co-occurrence matrices [11], Markov modeling [18], [27], Local Binary Patterns (LBP) [20], and texton-based approaches [26], [2] to name a few. Yet, it remains unclear which approach is suited best for an online application on a real outdoor robot both related to prediction accuracy and run-time performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common solution to obstacle detection is the use of structure cues, often simply labelling all points within a height range as an obstacle (Hadsell et al, 2009;Hadsell et al, 2007;Rankin, et al, 2010;Thrun, et al, 2007;Upcroft, et al, 2007;Vernaza, Taskar, & Lee, 2008). This method is adequate for many indoor environments due to their highly structured nature; traversable regions are invariably flat ground, while any protrusion from the ground can be considered an obstacle.…”
Section: Obstacle Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive and negative obstacles can be detected in 3D data using a known ground plane, and then locating points which are above and below the ground respectively by a given threshold (Hadsell, et al, 2009;Hadsell, et al, 2007;Rankin, et al, 2010;Thrun, et al, 2007;Upcroft, et al, 2007;Vernaza, et al, 2008).…”
Section: Structural Obstacle Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation