2021
DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1878815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-week variation of meibometry and tear break-up time in healthy subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No differences were reported in meibometry values between the quality of the MG secretion grades. This could be because the meibometry technique only measures the quantity of lipids present on the matt synthetic tape and not their quality [ 16 , 18 ]. It also does not consider the thickness of the meibum which depends of the chemical quality of the lipids (polar or not).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No differences were reported in meibometry values between the quality of the MG secretion grades. This could be because the meibometry technique only measures the quantity of lipids present on the matt synthetic tape and not their quality [ 16 , 18 ]. It also does not consider the thickness of the meibum which depends of the chemical quality of the lipids (polar or not).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average mean was calculated from three readings of the same tape on the photometry unit. Data was measured in Meibometer Units (MU) [ 16 , 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[17] The normal value of breakup time was 10 to 30 seconds, and <10 seconds indicated that the tear film of the subject was unstable. [18,19]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] The normal value of breakup time was 10 to 30 seconds, and <10 seconds indicated that the tear film of the subject was unstable. [18,19] Before and 6 months after operation, the degree of epiphora was evaluated in both groups. [20,21] The score ranged from 0 to 5 points, from 0 (no epiphora) to 5 (continuous epiphora every day), indicating that the times of epiphora per day was gradually increasing.…”
Section: Observed Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%