2011
DOI: 10.1186/cc9949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-observer agreement of Medical Research Council-sum score and handgrip strength in the ICU

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research coordinators facilitated patients’ completion of the measure (ie, by reading instructions and tasks and eliciting patient responses) if needed. We also assessed the following 4 performance-based measures at the same time points: Functional Status Score for ICU (FSS-ICU), 15 Medical Research Council Sum Score (MRC-SS), 19 Physical Function Test for ICU-scored (PFIT-s), 20 and the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz ADLs). 21 We conducted ICU awakening assessments once patients could follow 3 of 5 simple commands (open your eyes, look at me, open your mouth and stick out your tongue, nod your head, and raise your eyebrows when I count to 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research coordinators facilitated patients’ completion of the measure (ie, by reading instructions and tasks and eliciting patient responses) if needed. We also assessed the following 4 performance-based measures at the same time points: Functional Status Score for ICU (FSS-ICU), 15 Medical Research Council Sum Score (MRC-SS), 19 Physical Function Test for ICU-scored (PFIT-s), 20 and the Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (Katz ADLs). 21 We conducted ICU awakening assessments once patients could follow 3 of 5 simple commands (open your eyes, look at me, open your mouth and stick out your tongue, nod your head, and raise your eyebrows when I count to 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As variáveis estudadas incluíram dados de identificação do paciente (idade e sexo), diagnóstico clínico (câncer de colo de útero, ovário, endométrio, vagina e vulva), tratamentos prévios, comorbidades, força muscular (escala Escore do Sendo assim, para avaliação da força muscular, foi utilizado o Escore do Medical Research Council-Escala MRC, validada e adaptada para a população brasileira 7 , avalia 6 movimentos (abdução do ombro, flexão do cotovelo, extensão do punho, flexão do quadril, extensão do joelho e dorsiflexão do tornozelo) com graduação de força muscular variando de 0 a 5 (0 = Nenhuma contração visível; 1 = Contração visível e palpável sem movimento do segmento; 2 = Movimento ativo com eliminação da gravidade; 3 = Movimento ativo contra a gravidade; 4 = Movimento ativo contra a gravidade e resistência; 5 = Força normal do músculo contra a gravidade e resistência) 8 . Conforme o somatório da pontuação, a força muscular foi dividida em quatro categorias para a caracterização da amostra, a saber: MRC ≥ 48 a 60 pontos evidencia força muscular preservada; MRC < 48 pontos fraqueza muscular periférica; MRC < 30 pontos fraqueza muscular grave; e MRC < 27 pontos fraqueza muscular severa 9 .…”
Section: Métodosunclassified