2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-observer agreement in endoscopic scoring systems: Preliminary report of an ongoing study from the Italian Group for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limiting problems of this approach are limited by the fact that: (a) endoscopic scores are quite complex, lack a formal validation, and their reproducibility in IBD remains suboptimal, which could potentially have major effects on therapeutic choices 5, 6, 20 ; (b) there are numerous histological scores (only a couple fully validated), strongly influenced by treatments, and often complex to use in clinical practice 79 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limiting problems of this approach are limited by the fact that: (a) endoscopic scores are quite complex, lack a formal validation, and their reproducibility in IBD remains suboptimal, which could potentially have major effects on therapeutic choices 5, 6, 20 ; (b) there are numerous histological scores (only a couple fully validated), strongly influenced by treatments, and often complex to use in clinical practice 79 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CDEIS and the SES-CD are robust validated indices and they show high reproducibility among central readers 5 6. The absence of validated score thresholds associated with specific prognostic values or with endoscopic healing represents a weakness of both CDEIS and SES-CD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of the Rutgeerts’ score is when the anastomosis cannot be reached. Recently, its reproducibility was tested and agreement was fair (κ 0.57) among 14 IBD specialists 6. The pragmatic appeal of the score has been demonstrated by its widespread use in clinical trials and clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examination of individual factors revealed that stenosis and superficial ulceration grading had low inter-rater (0.48, 0.65) and intra-rater agreement (0.63, 0.78), respectively. Reproducibility of the Rutgeerts’ score has also been questioned, as a recent study of 14 IBD specialists found a Rutgeerts’ score agreement to be marginal, κ=0.57 30 .…”
Section: Limitations Of Ileocolonoscopy For Disease Activity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%