2015
DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2015.1044891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-individual differences in how presentation modality affects verbal learning performance in children aged 5 to 16

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is different from incidental learning, which is the accidental learning of information while actually concentrating on other information ( Thomas and Rohwer, 1986 ; Lezak et al, 2012 ; Hampshire et al, 2016 ; Ahmed, 2017 ; Kontaxopoulou et al, 2017 ). The ability of intentional learning typically improves with experience and with age ( Meijer et al, 2006 , 2007 ; Meijs et al, 2013 , 2016 ; Blachstein and Vakil, 2016 ). It appears that there are major individual differences in the pace at which intentional learning develops at the end of childhood and the beginning of adolescence ( Meijer et al, 2007 ; Jolles, 2016 ; Meijs et al, 2016 ; Juraska and Willing, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is different from incidental learning, which is the accidental learning of information while actually concentrating on other information ( Thomas and Rohwer, 1986 ; Lezak et al, 2012 ; Hampshire et al, 2016 ; Ahmed, 2017 ; Kontaxopoulou et al, 2017 ). The ability of intentional learning typically improves with experience and with age ( Meijer et al, 2006 , 2007 ; Meijs et al, 2013 , 2016 ; Blachstein and Vakil, 2016 ). It appears that there are major individual differences in the pace at which intentional learning develops at the end of childhood and the beginning of adolescence ( Meijer et al, 2007 ; Jolles, 2016 ; Meijs et al, 2016 ; Juraska and Willing, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamics of verbal-conceptual intelligence is more ambiguous and contradictory. Perhaps, the reason for the ambiguity of verbal-conceptual development is determined by the incomplete process of the formation of verbal memory in preschoolers and junior students, the intensification of which is associated with schooling [13,14]. This material does not contradict the existing ideas about the maturation of the frontaltemporal and parietal fields of the cerebral cortex in later ontogenesis [19] compared to the parietal-occipital areas.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…There is a clear lack of experimentally obtained facts regarding the dynamics of the intellectual development of children of preschool and primary school age in the period of the formation of the information-digital society. In this regard, there is an obvious interest in the results of the examination of children in the age range from 6 to 10 years [11][12][13][14], which is considered as sensitive to the influence of the social environment on the formation of intellectual functions, including its informational components in the form of new technological making. Our materials, which were obtained in different years on the populations of senior preschool children of the same pre-school educational institution, allow us to compare changes in intellectual functions as the digital society develops.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Практические наблюдения и результаты исследований позволили установить, что подрастающее поколение предпочитает визуальную и «вырожденную» устно-речевую форму передачи информации в сети Meijs et al, 2016;Vogan et al, 2016;Иванова, 2018). Речевые высказывания, которыми обмениваются юные пользователи социальных сетей, отличаются предельной краткостью, часто сочетаемой с неправильной грамматической формой и примитивным синтаксисом.…”
unclassified