2018
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter- and intraobserver reliability for angiographic leptomeningeal collateral flow assessment by the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) scale

Abstract: Inter- and intraobserver agreement of collateral circulation grading using the ASITN/SIR score was poor, raising concerns about comparisons among publications. A simplified dichotomized judgment may be a more reproducible assessment when images are rated by the same observer(s) in randomized trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no significant differences in age, sex, presentation systolic blood pressure, medical comorbidities or other factors between patients with good and poor collaterals ( Table 1). Stroke severity did not significantly differ between patients with good (median NIHSS score 14; IQR, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and poor (median NIHSS score 17; IQR, 13-21; P = 0.077) collaterals. The side of the stroke and frequency of intravenous thrombolysis therapy did not differ between groups (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There were no significant differences in age, sex, presentation systolic blood pressure, medical comorbidities or other factors between patients with good and poor collaterals ( Table 1). Stroke severity did not significantly differ between patients with good (median NIHSS score 14; IQR, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and poor (median NIHSS score 17; IQR, 13-21; P = 0.077) collaterals. The side of the stroke and frequency of intravenous thrombolysis therapy did not differ between groups (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Given the increasing use of perfusion imaging in the triage of patients with AIS, HIR determined by CT or MR perfusion may serve as a valuable biomarker of collateral status. The ability to calculate HIR using automated software (RAPID) eliminates potential inter-reader variability that often limits alternative assessments of collateral status [15], makes HIR a powerful tool in the evaluation of patients with AIS being considered for interfacility transfer for EMT [19] and gives perfusion a strong advantage in collateral evaluation compared with CTA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of keeping only easily accessible criteria explains the non-accounting of leptomeningeal collaterality assessment in the MT-DRAGON score. As recently described, the standard classification (American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology) based on DSA is not reliable,23 and cannot be obtained at the early stage of management, before groin puncture. Current non-invasive methods of assessing collaterality have not yet been recommended by recent guidelines for early management of patients with AIS-LVO 1…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) collateral scale, based on DSA, it classifies the cerebral collateral status to grades from 0 to 4. When there is a dichotomized score, "inadequate collaterals" (score of 0, 1, or 2) versus "adequate collaterals" (score of 3 or 4) was used [12].…”
Section: Angiography and Assessment Of Collateral Circulationmentioning
confidence: 99%