2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter- and intraobserver agreement on the Load Sharing Classification of thoracolumbar spine fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The patients in our population with an LSC < 7 are possibly due to inter-and intraobserver variability of the LSC. Moderate inter-and intraobserver agreement of LSC scores between 3-6 and 7-9 has been reported [45]. Although results are stratified for injury severity, it is still possible that QOL is influenced by accompanying or even later sustained injuries.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients in our population with an LSC < 7 are possibly due to inter-and intraobserver variability of the LSC. Moderate inter-and intraobserver agreement of LSC scores between 3-6 and 7-9 has been reported [45]. Although results are stratified for injury severity, it is still possible that QOL is influenced by accompanying or even later sustained injuries.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dai and Jin [14] showed high levels of agreement when the Load Sharing Classification was used to assess thoracolumbar burst fractures. Elzinga et al [15] results were lower levels than Dai's, but the inter-and intraobserver reliability of the Load Sharing Classification of Spinal fractures could still be rated as fair.…”
Section: Clinical Application Of Load Sharing Classificationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It can therefore be a valuable alternative to perform a circumferential fusion in order to reduce the deformity with stable results [ 14 16 ], using a balloon kyphoplasty [ 17 , 18 ] or an anterior approach [ 19 ]. In this series, rationale for an anterior approach instead of balloon kyphoplasty was based on the important bone defect on the initial CT-scan or the presence of a disc disruption on the preoperative MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%