2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter- and intraobserver agreement of ADC measurements of lung cancer in free breathing, breath-hold and respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reproducibility of ADC values was slightly poorer than that of D values, although fewer b values were used to generate ADC maps and one of them is 0 s/mm 2 , suggesting that the D values derived from biexponential data fitting and the ADC values derived from monoexponential data fitting were probably similar in a uniform tissue . Also, our study showed similar reproducibility of ADC in lung cancer compared to the value reported by Cui et al (WCV 3.6–5.7%). We also achieved slightly better results than those reported by Bernardin et al (CV 8.9–11%), which may be because the latter focused on populations with smaller lung metastases, although they used a region‐growing function method to reduce the measurement errors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reproducibility of ADC values was slightly poorer than that of D values, although fewer b values were used to generate ADC maps and one of them is 0 s/mm 2 , suggesting that the D values derived from biexponential data fitting and the ADC values derived from monoexponential data fitting were probably similar in a uniform tissue . Also, our study showed similar reproducibility of ADC in lung cancer compared to the value reported by Cui et al (WCV 3.6–5.7%). We also achieved slightly better results than those reported by Bernardin et al (CV 8.9–11%), which may be because the latter focused on populations with smaller lung metastases, although they used a region‐growing function method to reduce the measurement errors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…However, the image quality using this technique can be degraded due to low resolution, artifacts, and geometric distortion. 13 3T MRI has been advocated for the 13,24 A previous study 25 has shown that ADC has good inter-and intraobserver agreement in all freebreathing, breath-hold, and respiratory-triggered DWIs. However, the duration of respiratory-triggered scan is prolonged by irregular breathing and breath-holding scan may be confronted with low compliance in patients with massive pleural effusion or large chest tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra‐ and interobserver variations for manual contours of lung tumors are well documented in the literature, in CT, in PET/CT fusion and in 4DCT images. In terms of MRI of lung cancer, intra/inter observer metrics have been evaluated for breath held lung volumes in MR/CT images, as well diffusion metrics . However, in terms of lung tumor target delineation, to the best knowledge of the authors (i.e., PubMed/Google Scholar), this is the first assessment of intraobserver and interobserver variations in the dynamic lung MR images for monitoring the changes in tumor shape and location in real‐time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of MRI of lung cancer, intra/inter observer metrics have been evaluated for breath held lung volumes in MR/CT images, 25 as well diffusion metrics. 26,27 However, in terms of lung tumor target delineation, to the best knowledge of the authors (i.e., PubMed/Google Scholar), this is the first assessment of intraobserver and interobserver variations in the dynamic lung MR images for monitoring the changes in tumor shape and location in real-time. This is also the first study in which a user-trained autocontouring algorithm has been benchmarked against variation metrics of multiple expert users, as suggested by Valentini et al 28 on dynamic lung MR images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If motion corrections or registration techniques are not utilised, the respiratory motion might possibly alter ADC results and hinder DWI score evaluation. However, it has been recently shown that reliable ADC measurements can be obtained in free breathing, breath-hold and respiratory triggered DWI of lung cancer [30]. Moreover at the time of the study, we did not have the dedicated software for imaging registration that we are currently developing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%