2014
DOI: 10.1177/194008291400700313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intentional Snake Road-Kill: A Case Study using Fake Snakes on a Brazilian Road

Abstract: Records of snakes are common in fauna road-kill monitoring studies in different Brazilian regions. To determine the intentionality of snake road-killing on a Brazilian road, the following hypotheses were tested: (1) more fake snakes are intentionally killed on the road than objects not similar to snakes; (2) the time elapsed until the first intentional fake snake road-kill is less than that for dissimilar objects; (3) the proportion of intentional collisions with fake snakes does not depend on the type of vehi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Some factors are driven by road characteristics (type of road, number of cars per time unit) and also by driver behaviour [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Indeed, studies have shown that roadkills of snakes are intentional [12][13][14]. Even the level of conservation protection affects the risk of being road-killed: protected areas can have a higher proportion of roadkills [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some factors are driven by road characteristics (type of road, number of cars per time unit) and also by driver behaviour [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Indeed, studies have shown that roadkills of snakes are intentional [12][13][14]. Even the level of conservation protection affects the risk of being road-killed: protected areas can have a higher proportion of roadkills [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roads can even cause more wildlife mortality than hunting (Forman and Alexander ), illegal wildlife trade (Andrews et al ), or predation (Bujoczek et al ). Among the animals most susceptible to roadkill are snakes (Andrews et al ), predominantly because of their attraction to warm road surfaces for thermoregulation (Mccardle and Fontenot ), the availability of certain prey along roads (Andrews et al ), the immobilizing behavior of some species in response to oncoming traffic (Andrews and Gibbons ), and intentional killing by humans when snakes are seen on roads (Secco et al ). To understand and formulate recommendations to reduce road mortality, several studies have investigated factors thought to influence snake roadkill, including proximity to water or wetlands (Langen et al , D'Amico et al , Seo et al ), proximity to agriculture (Gonçalves et al ), elevation (Pragatheesh and Rajvanshi ), roadside vegetation (Jochimsen ), temperature (D'Amico et al ), season (Seo et al ), and species size and taxonomic affiliation (Andrews and Gibbons ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second group most affected by road-kills in our study was reptiles, particularly snakes. We listed four possible reasons that may contribute to the road-kill rate among snakes: 1) use of the road as a thermoregulatory surface (Sullivan 1981, Mccardle & Fontenot 2016, Gonçalves et al 2018; 2) motionlessness as a defensive tactic used by some species (Andrews & Gibbons 2005); 3) intentional road-killing of snakes (Secco et al 2014); and 4) locomotion limitations imposed by low friction surface of roads, compared to natural ground (D.C. Ward, W. F. Bien, I. Telenchev et al, unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%