Intention Towards Digital Social Entrepreneurship: An Integrated Model

Ghatak, Arpita; Chatterjee, Swagato; Bhowmick, Bhaskar

doi:10.1080/19420676.2020.1826563

Cited by 44 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although N-Helix collaborations imply multiple challenges (Iqbal et al, 2018;Saiz-Álvarez & Palma-Ruiz, 2019), social distance restrictions and the COVID-19 stakeholders' needs have encouraged N-Helix agents to look for a crucial intersection between social entrepreneurship (SE) and digital entrepreneurship (DE) initiatives that have configurated the called digital social entrepreneurship (DSE). In this new scenario, digital technologies have been an invaluable resource for multiple N-Helix collaborations oriented to create an agile response to the global pandemic effects (Ghatak et al, 2020;Short et al, 2009;Siegel & Guerrero, 2021). DSE can come in various sizes, depending on the resources involved in its creation.…”

Section: The Stakeholders' Needs Satisfaction: N-helix Via Digital Somentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Second, government responsiveness is a binary variable that takes the value one if it is developed only by the government and otherwise zero (Guerrero, et al, 2020a;Guerrero, et al, 2020b;Susanto et al, 2017). Third, the variable digital social entrepreneurship is a binary variable that captures value one when the app was created for social purposes (satisfy the COVID-19 needs) and zero when the app was created for commercial purposes (Battisti, 2019;Ghatak et al, 2020;Luke & Chu, 2013;Short et al, 2009). Fourth, the N-Helix is a count variable that indicates how many stakeholders participate in developing the app for social purposes (e.g., government, university, industry, non-profit organizations) (Baier-Fuentes et al, 2021;Guerrero, et al, 2020a;Guerrero, et al, 2020b;Lazzarotti & Manzini, 2009;Santos & Mendonça, 2017).…”

Section: Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In comparison, digital entrepreneurship (DE) represents the emergence of new entrepreneurial initiatives that incorporated digital technologies like artifacts and platforms(Nambisan, 2017 ). Following these assumptions, digital social entrepreneurship (DSE) represents entrepreneurial initiatives with social purposes developed by incorporating digital technologies into their business model as a result of the interaction of N-Helix agents (Battisti, 2019 ; Ghatak et al, 2020 ; Short et al, 2009 ). This non-documented phenomenon represents the missing link between innovation, technology, and entrepreneurship literature.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Digital social entrepreneurship: the N-Helix response to stakeholders’ COVID-19 needs

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explores the emergence of a new entrepreneurship phenomenon (digital social entrepreneurship) as a result of the collaboration among many agents (N-Helix), given the government’s limited capacity to respond to the stakeholders’ needs satisfaction related to an exogenous event (e.g., the COVID-19 pandemic). Our theory development is based on three ongoing academic debates related to (a) the unrepresentativeness of the stakeholder theory in entrepreneurship research; (b) the emergence of digital social entrepreneurship (DSE) as a bridge between stakeholders’ needs, socio-economic actors, and digital-social initiatives; and (c) the role of N-Helix collaborations to facilitate the emergence of global knowledge-intensive initiatives and the rapid adoptions of open innovations. Our results support our assumptions about the positive mediation effect of DSE in the relationship between N-Helix collaborations and stakeholders’ satisfaction. Notably, results show how pandemic has intensified these relationships and how DSE in N-Helix collaborations can generate social impacts globally. Some implications for policy-makers have emerged from our results that should be considered during/post-COVID-19 pandemic.

show abstract

Section: The Stakeholders' Needs Satisfaction: N-helix Via Digital Somentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Digital social entrepreneurship: the N-Helix response to stakeholders’ COVID-19 needs

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This research also still has not linked gender differences, culture, and other factors in its analysis. Further research can develop other elements on the social entrepreneurial intention variable by using the Mair & Naboa (2006), model involving social business practitioners as respondents, linking the new theme of Islamic Social Entrepreneurial Intention (Ashraf, 2019), digital social entrepreneurship (Ghatak et al 2020), as well as other relevant issues.…”

Section: Recommendationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceived Social Support as Moderator Variable Between the Attitude of Becoming A Social Entrepreneur (ATB) On Social Entrepreneurial Intention

Jadmiko

2021

JIEBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research is motivated by the development of the social entrepreneurship topic among students. This research focused on analyzing the antecedents of social entrepreneurial intention by involving attitudes towards becoming a social entrepreneur (ATB) and social support. A total of 208 students at Universitas Bung Hatta became respondents with the criteria of having taken lectures for at least two semesters. Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) method was used to test the moderating hypothesis (perceived social support). This research shows that the higher the perceived social support perceived by students, the stronger the influence between ATB on social entrepreneurial intention. In this research, perceived social support plays a moderator role (purely moderated) in the relationship between ATB and social entrepreneurial intention. In addition, interesting findings of the moderating effect by gender where women have a higher moderating effect than men. One of the limitations of this research is that the sample was only within the scope of students. Hopefully, future researches can expand the scope of the sample, such as involving social entrepreneurs, so that the generalization of research results can be better. In addition, this research still has not linked several elements of context and factors, including culture, gender differences, personality characteristics, to the context of differences in developed and developing countries (local wisdom).

show abstract

“…Notably, the SEE almost only empirically through models of Mair and Noboa (2006) and put this model to become one of the main models in the field of research social entrepreneurial intentions. Like the TPB, the research and development on the Mair and Noboa (2006)'s model also appeared frequently in the line of research on the intention to start a social enterprise (Ashraf, 2019;Aure, 2018;Baierl, Grichnik, Spörrle, & Welpe, 2014;de Sousa-Filho, Matos, da Silva Trajano, & de Souza Lessa, 2020;Forster & Grichnik, 2013;Ghatak, Chatterjee, & Bhowmick, 2020;Hockerts, 2013Hockerts, , 2017Igwe et al, 2020;Ip, Liang, Wu, Law, & Liu, 2018;Lacap, Mulyaningsih, & Ramadani, 2018;Liu, Liang, Chang, Ip, & Liang, 2020;Mair & Noboa, 2006;Rambe, 2019;Urban & Kujinga, 2017a,b). Third, it is not impossible to mention Tran and Von Korflesch (2016) groundbreaking theoretical approach.…”

Section: ) the First Approach Is To Test And Develop Research Models Of Social Entrepreneurial Intentionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social entrepreneurial intention: A systematic literature review and outlook

Anh

Lan

Loan

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since 2017, social entrepreneurial intention is a rapidly growing field of research. The research to explain the formation of intent to establish social enterprises be approached from many aspects, as well as based on different theoretical backgrounds. However, a large part of this study lacked systematization and classifications, and there seems to be a tendency to start anew with every study. Therefore, there should be an overview of current knowledge in this field. In this sense, this article does a literature review of social entrepreneurial intention. A total of 51/138 articles related to social entrepreneurship intentions searched from the Scopus database, published between 2006 and 2020, were analyzed. The purpose and contribution of this paper are to provide a clearer picture of the research approaches in social startup intent research. Several research gaps are identified in each of these approaches, with implications for researchers interested in filling these theoretical gaps.

show abstract

Intention Towards Digital Social Entrepreneurship: An Integrated Model

Cited by 44 publications

References 65 publications

Digital social entrepreneurship: the N-Helix response to stakeholders’ COVID-19 needs

Digital social entrepreneurship: the N-Helix response to stakeholders’ COVID-19 needs

Perceived Social Support as Moderator Variable Between the Attitude of Becoming A Social Entrepreneur (ATB) On Social Entrepreneurial Intention

Social entrepreneurial intention: A systematic literature review and outlook

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About