2021
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30724-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 in Australia

Abstract: different population groups to ensure public health campaigns remain responsive to community vaccine sentiments. Given the potential impact of vaccine hesitancy on the required population herd immunity threshold, we need to understand the attitudinal and behavioural drivers in order to inform community-led communication strategies to build trust and optimise COVID-19 vaccine uptake.We declare no competing interests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

51
243
11
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(3 reference statements)
51
243
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study is one of a small but growing number of papers examining COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Australia, in the lead up to a vaccine becoming available [ 10 , 11 ]. However, we are the only paper to date showing that the ‘maybe’ group differs significantly from those willing or unwilling to accept a COVID-19 vaccine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our study is one of a small but growing number of papers examining COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Australia, in the lead up to a vaccine becoming available [ 10 , 11 ]. However, we are the only paper to date showing that the ‘maybe’ group differs significantly from those willing or unwilling to accept a COVID-19 vaccine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we are the only paper to date showing that the ‘maybe’ group differs significantly from those willing or unwilling to accept a COVID-19 vaccine. Our study had a lower number of ‘yes’ responses than other studies, however it is difficult to compare this number with existing studies, as they employed different methodologies (e.g., collapsing a 4-point agreement scale into two groups [ 10 ], or using ‘neutral/no opinion’ as a mid-point rather than ‘maybe’ [ 9 ]) and sampled different target populations (e.g., focus on parents, most of whom were younger than our sample [ 11 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A later survey from Shenzhen, China by Zhang et al, that surveyed parents/guardians who were faculty workers, on their acceptability of children COVID-19 vaccination reported a lower rate of 72.5% compared to the previous studies [52]. Similarly, an online survey on Australian parents showed an acceptance rate of 77.3% [49]. The lowest COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate among the general public in the region was reported by Lazarus et al, in Singapore (67.9%) [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%