Intention of Chinese college students to use carsharing: An application of the theory of planned behavior

Predicting Behavioral Intention of Rural Inhabitants toward Economic Incentive for Deforestation in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

“…"Perceived behavioral control-This refers to a person's perception of the ease or difficulty to perform the behavior of interest. It consisted of personal control beliefs (cb i ) and the perceived strength of these specific control factors to facilitate or impede actions (power to affect-pc i ) [50,67,68].…”

Comparing the Relative Importance of Predictors of Intention to Use Bicycles

“…Since its introduction, the TPB ( Ajzen, 1991 ) has been used to understand behavioral intentions in various areas, such as consumer choices, environmentally supportive behaviors, and health behaviors ( Harland et al, 1999 ; Sheeran et al, 2001 ; Garcìa et al, 2019 ; Grilli and Notaro, 2019 ; Coşkun and Özbük, 2020 ; Zhang and Li, 2020 ); moreover, the TPB is one of the most widely used psychological models to study commuting behavior [for a review, see Jakovcevic et al (2015) ]. The theory states that subjects rationally make decisions based on a cost-benefit calculation.…”

Carsharing: a systematic literature review and research agenda

“…For example, lack of prior experience of similar services (such as car rental) is likely to deter certain potential customer groups from using carsharing. Both Duan et al (2020), who used a stated preference survey to quantify the impacts of potential carsharing demands in Shanghai, and Zhang and Li (2020), who tested a model based on the theory of planned behavior in a study involving university students in Qingdao, China, reported that individuals who are familiar with car rental programs are more inclined to use carsharing.…”

“…. (2017a), Burlando et al (2019), Carten ı et al (2016), De Luca and Di Pace (2015), Guglielmetti Mugion et al (2019),Hjorteset and B€ ocker (2020),Prieto et al (2017),Shaheen and Martin (2010),Tran et al (2019),Tyndall (2017) Higher demand among single-person households, especially males in their 20s and 30s and city center residents Customers are predominantly young, male, middle class, more highly educated and from a household of below-average size GeographicCsonka and Csiszar (2016), Diana and Ceccato (2019), Jian et al (2016), Juschten et al (2019), Kent et al (2017), Kim et al (2017b), M€ unzel et al (2020), Zhou and Kockelman (2011) Customers who opt for carsharing are encouraged by car availability, reliability and parking conditions Socioeconomic Boldrini et al (2019), Hjorteset and B€ ocker (2020), Clewlow (2016), Coll et al (2014), Chun et al (2019), M€ unzel et al (2020) Higher education levels, moderate upper income levels Population density Becker et al (2017b), Cohen et al (2008), Coll et al (2014), de Lorimier and El-Geneidy (2013) Carsharing scales with population density and social activity in a given area Environmental benefits Kim et al (2017a), M€ unzel et al (2020), Julsrud and Farstad (2020) Environmental benefits are important but are not the sole driver of carsharing service use High service quality Fleury et al (2017) Customers, especially B2B, are attracted by high-quality services such as fleet management, tutorials and ability to access help Barriers Limited availability Shaheen et al (1998), Kim et al (2017a), Kim et al (2019), de Lorimier and El-Geneidy (2013)Likelihood of using carsharing services is reduced by increased waiting time for a shared car Low public awarenessBurlando et al (2019),Duncan (2011),Zhang and Li (2020),Zhou et al (2017) …”