2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensive, site-specific silviculture: Manipulating resource availability at establishment for improved stand productivity. A review of South African research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the greatest growth response is usually observed for potassium and phosphorus fertilizer application Laclau et al 2009;du Toit et al 2010), tree growth is generally more dependent on nitrogen (N) addition in Australia ). Nutrient budgets established over a full rotation, as well as modelling approaches, have shown that current silvicultural practices lead to higher N outputs than N inputs in most commercial plantations (Corbeels et al 2005;Laclau et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the greatest growth response is usually observed for potassium and phosphorus fertilizer application Laclau et al 2009;du Toit et al 2010), tree growth is generally more dependent on nitrogen (N) addition in Australia ). Nutrient budgets established over a full rotation, as well as modelling approaches, have shown that current silvicultural practices lead to higher N outputs than N inputs in most commercial plantations (Corbeels et al 2005;Laclau et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAO [34] considered 18 years suitable for E. saligna and E. grandis and 12 years for E. camaldulensis. Du Toit et al [47] found a 9 to 12 year rotation period to be optimal for E. macarthurii and 6 to 11 year for E. grandis under coppice management, and 18 to 52 years for timber uses.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corresponded to all the initial silviculture land preparation trials that showed cultivation was beneficial during afforestation (planting of grassveld) but had no effect at re-establishment. According to du Toit et al (2010), surface ploughing for the establishment of the F1R (grasslands) site resulted in improved productivity because of nutrient mineralisation and the physical break-down of the dense root mat normally formed on the grassveld. Ripping or subsoiling after the F1R had shown no significant improvement in site productivity (du Toit et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to du Toit et al (2010), surface ploughing for the establishment of the F1R (grasslands) site resulted in improved productivity because of nutrient mineralisation and the physical break-down of the dense root mat normally formed on the grassveld. Ripping or subsoiling after the F1R had shown no significant improvement in site productivity (du Toit et al 2010). The application of lime had no significant difference in productivity between the control (slash retained) and lime treatments, similar to findings by Wall (2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%