2013
DOI: 10.7220/mosr.1392.1142.2013.66.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intensity of nepotism expression in organizations of Lithuania

Abstract: The results of the empirical research of the influence of nepotism on organisational culture are presented in the article. The questionnaire is composed of two parts: the phenomenon of nepotism and the sick culture of the organisation. This article presents the first part of the results of the research evaluating the expression of nepotism in relations with co-workers, the expression of nepotism in respect of managers and the aspects of positivity and negativity of nepotism. The results of this research are us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be clearly seen that most of the persons surveyed negatively evaluated the listed nepotic situations (9 out of the 13 analyzed nepotic situations were negatively evaluated by over two-thirds of the sample). This is consistent with other studies of organizational nepotism, where it was also assessed as a phenomenon negatively affecting the functioning of the organization and interpersonal relations (Padgett and Morris 2005;Abdalla et al 1995;Arasli et al 2006;Vveinhardt and Petrauskaitė 2013). Behaviors characterized by nepotism seem to be accepted with respect to family businesses only.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…It can be clearly seen that most of the persons surveyed negatively evaluated the listed nepotic situations (9 out of the 13 analyzed nepotic situations were negatively evaluated by over two-thirds of the sample). This is consistent with other studies of organizational nepotism, where it was also assessed as a phenomenon negatively affecting the functioning of the organization and interpersonal relations (Padgett and Morris 2005;Abdalla et al 1995;Arasli et al 2006;Vveinhardt and Petrauskaitė 2013). Behaviors characterized by nepotism seem to be accepted with respect to family businesses only.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…As a result, dissatisfaction at work may be observed. This situation may also lead to "word of mouth" dissemination of negative feedback about the organisation; when recruiting or promoting, the priority is given not to the employee's professional competence, but to kinship relations, friendliness or on the basis of subjective benevolence to one or another person, it negatively affects the quality of human resources across the organisation as a whole [12,13,58,59]. Based on this, one can state that nepotism and favouritism are bad for employees who are forced to weigh conflicting obligations, as well as for co-workers who become demoralized when they suspect the worst, and they are bad for organizational performance.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nepotism can provoke jealousy and resentment among other employees (Eiving, 1965). Their trust in the organization (Keles et al, 2011) and the managerial staff are reduced (Vveinhardt and Petrauskaite, 2013). It has a negative impact on the company's organizational culture (Vveinhardt and Petrauskaite, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpersonal communication is difficult. Persons employed on a normal basis have concerns for cooperation and communication with persons employed on the basis of family connections (Vveinhardt and Petrauskaite, 2013). Employees' willingness to leave the company also increases (Padgett et al 2015), and also, if information about the practices of nepotism gets into the environment, the willingness to hire outsiders decreases (Eiving, 1965).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%