2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-013-1098-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent synthetic composite indicators with application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, FCM-based imputation also has some disadvantages. For example, OCS [30][31] used initial values and available feature values to calculate FCM cluster prototypes, and the missing values were estimated based on these biased cluster prototypes. Hence, the computation of the FCM cluster prototype and the imputation of the missing value would influence each other.…”
Section: Discussion and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, FCM-based imputation also has some disadvantages. For example, OCS [30][31] used initial values and available feature values to calculate FCM cluster prototypes, and the missing values were estimated based on these biased cluster prototypes. Hence, the computation of the FCM cluster prototype and the imputation of the missing value would influence each other.…”
Section: Discussion and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hathaway and Bezdek [30] proposed four FCM imputation techniques, and they pointed out that whole data strategy and partial distance strategy are faster to end, but the optimal completion strategy (OCS) and nearest prototype strategy (NPS) were outperformed over the first two methods based on accuracy and misclassification errors. In addition, Al Shami et al [31] applied FCM-based OCS and NPS to compare four statistical imputation methods in their work for accurately substitute missing scores when producing the intelligent synthetic composite indicators. Therefore, we briefly introduced FCM-based OCS and NPS methods as follows.…”
Section: Computational Intelligence Imputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the provided answers were analyzed using the Fuzzy Proximity Knowledge Mining technique, as explained by Al Shami et al (2013), and the findings were assembled in an infographic presentation. This was achieved by searching and finding the most frequently matched key lexical phrases for a certain question.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the results of this query are usually presented in Tree or Word Map tabs which display the most frequently used terms by the respondents as a series of rectangles in which frequently occurring words are in larger rectangles (Al Shami et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise process will repeat again from step 2. After a number of iterations, cluster centres will satisfy the minimisation of the cost function J to a local minimum [19].…”
Section: A Compared Techniques: K-means Vs Fuzzy C-meansmentioning
confidence: 99%