2011 IEEE International Electric Machines &Amp; Drives Conference (IEMDC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iemdc.2011.5994628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent speed control of interior permanent magnet motor drives using a single untrained artificial neuron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main factors causing thrust fluctuations include cogging and end effects caused by core slots, the viscous friction caused by the motion of the mover, and sliding friction disturbances. [15][16][17] Vector control is an effective control method for linear motors, usually including the following control methods: rotor flux orientation control, stator flux linkage control, maximum thrust current ratio control, field weakening control, i d = 0 vector control, direct torque control, constant magnetic control, and so on. Among them, i d = 0 vector control is known as a control method with good control precision and rapidity.…”
Section: Pmlsm Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main factors causing thrust fluctuations include cogging and end effects caused by core slots, the viscous friction caused by the motion of the mover, and sliding friction disturbances. [15][16][17] Vector control is an effective control method for linear motors, usually including the following control methods: rotor flux orientation control, stator flux linkage control, maximum thrust current ratio control, field weakening control, i d = 0 vector control, direct torque control, constant magnetic control, and so on. Among them, i d = 0 vector control is known as a control method with good control precision and rapidity.…”
Section: Pmlsm Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these controllers are inherently unable to simultaneously meet good step reference tracking and good load torque rejection. Many other different control techniques of varying degrees of complexity have appeared based on the nature of drive applications, such as non-linear control with adaptive backstepping technique [4][5][6], variable structure controller (VSC) with two degrees of freedom control [7], sliding mode controller (SMC) [8,9], VSC [10,11], integral VSC combined with linear quadratic regulator [12], fuzzy logic controller (FLC) [13][14][15][16], adaptive FLC [17,18], neural network controller (NNC) [19], neuro-fuzzy controller (NFC) [20], and genetic-based FLC [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the PMSM system is a complex nonlinear system with multiple coupled states and unavoidable and unmeasured disturbances, as well as parameter perturbations. To achieve high-performance control, various advanced control methods have been proposed, such as adaptive control [3], robust control [4], sliding mode control [5,6], optimal control [7], backstepping control [8], predictive control [9], fuzzy control [10], neural network control [11], finite-time control [12], fractional order control [13,14], and intelligent control [15]. These methods have increased the dynamic and steady state performance of PMSM systems to some degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%