2006
DOI: 10.1007/11731139_92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Particle Swarm Optimization in Multi-objective Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the iterations where a particle follows its own way, a local search procedure is used. Ho et al [89] proposes a novel intelligent multi-objective particle swarm optimization (IMOPSO) to solve multi-objective optimization problems.…”
Section: Bench Mark Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the iterations where a particle follows its own way, a local search procedure is used. Ho et al [89] proposes a novel intelligent multi-objective particle swarm optimization (IMOPSO) to solve multi-objective optimization problems.…”
Section: Bench Mark Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li [39] introduced a non-dominated sorting PSO method to increase information sharing among all the particles to propel the population to move toward the true Pareto-optimal front. Ho et al [40] used a generalized Pareto-based scaleindependent fitness function for scoring the candidate solutions and employs a divide-and-conquer approach to determine the next move of a particle based on orthogonal experimental design. Tripathi et al [41] presented a time variant MOPSO that allows parameters such as inertia weight and acceleration coefficients to change with iterations.…”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because PSO requires only primitive mathematical operators and is computationally inexpensive in terms of both memory requirements and speed (Parsopoulos and Vrahatis 2002), it has good convergence performance and has been successfully applied in many fields such as neural network training ), integral programming (Kitayama and Yasuda 2006), multi-objective optimization (Ho et al 2006), and decision making (Nenortaitė 2007). …”
Section: Particle Swarm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%