2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling bearing using deep wavelet auto-encoder with extreme learning machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiment 1 (the test bearing data set of Western Reserve University). In order to verify the superiority of the proposed method, the XCN model proposed in the previous section is compared with other deep learning algorithms for nearly three years: DWAE+ELM [23] which is based on deep wavelet autoencoder with extreme learning machine, CapsNet which is based on standard capsule neural network, MPE+ISVM+BT [22] which is based on multiscale permutation entropy and improved support vector machine based binary tree, AE+ES+CNN [26] which is based on an acoustic emission analysis-based bearing fault diagnosis invariant under fluctuations of rotational speeds using envelope spectrums and a convolutional neural network, and DBN [25] which is based on the standard deep belief network. Finally, the test accuracy of each algorithm is shown in Table 2 and Figure 15.…”
Section: Reliably Of the Xcn Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Experiment 1 (the test bearing data set of Western Reserve University). In order to verify the superiority of the proposed method, the XCN model proposed in the previous section is compared with other deep learning algorithms for nearly three years: DWAE+ELM [23] which is based on deep wavelet autoencoder with extreme learning machine, CapsNet which is based on standard capsule neural network, MPE+ISVM+BT [22] which is based on multiscale permutation entropy and improved support vector machine based binary tree, AE+ES+CNN [26] which is based on an acoustic emission analysis-based bearing fault diagnosis invariant under fluctuations of rotational speeds using envelope spectrums and a convolutional neural network, and DBN [25] which is based on the standard deep belief network. Finally, the test accuracy of each algorithm is shown in Table 2 and Figure 15.…”
Section: Reliably Of the Xcn Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the timefrequency graphs were imported into the XCN model after adjusting the pixel size. Finally, the same input was imported into other algorithms such as DWAE+ELM [23], CapsNet, MPE+ISVM+BT [22], AE+ES+CNN [26], and DBN [25] and tested the failure diagnosis performance of these methods. In this experiment, sixty percent of the adjusted timefrequency graphs were used for algorithm training and forty percent were used for testing.…”
Section: Reliably Of the Xcn Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The accuracy achieved more than 99% [5]. The detection of rolling bearing fault are used Continuous Deep Belief Network(CDBN) and Continuous Restricted Boltzmann machines(CRBMs) .The CDBN are optimized with genetic algorithm(GA) [6].The four condition of detection and classification in roller bearing: healthy, inner race defect, outer race defect and double holes in outer race used an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) [7].Fault diagnosis of rolling bearing are analysis by Hilbert Transform(HT) and Fast Fourier Transform(FFT).Artificial Neural Network used genetic algorithm into optimization [8]. In addition, the model of linear bearing was employed to detect fault form vibration signal.…”
Section: Fig1 Auto Core Adhesion Mounting Machine (Acam)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The industries vital challenge is the initial as well as the exposure and analysis of process faults to maintain a secure process and reduce the productivity loss. With the help of process monitoring these issues are addressed [10]. Into three groups the process monitoring approaches can be grouped they are model-based, knowledge-based and databased methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%