2021
DOI: 10.1186/s43074-021-00044-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent designs in nanophotonics: from optimization towards inverse creation

Abstract: Applying intelligence algorithms to conceive nanoscale meta-devices becomes a flourishing and extremely active scientific topic over the past few years. Inverse design of functional nanostructures is at the heart of this topic, in which artificial intelligence (AI) furnishes various optimization toolboxes to speed up prototyping of photonic layouts with enhanced performance. In this review, we offer a systemic view on recent advancements in nanophotonic components designed by intelligence algorithms, manifesti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the performance of the ratio of average focal efficiency (η) to the root-mean-square deviation of the focal efficiencies (η rms ) of the multiple focal spots, i.e., FOM ¼ η=η rms . To speed up the optimization, intelligent algorithms would be the right hand [172][173][174] .…”
Section: Limitations Of Multifunctional Metalensesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the performance of the ratio of average focal efficiency (η) to the root-mean-square deviation of the focal efficiencies (η rms ) of the multiple focal spots, i.e., FOM ¼ η=η rms . To speed up the optimization, intelligent algorithms would be the right hand [172][173][174] .…”
Section: Limitations Of Multifunctional Metalensesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverse design consumed times of the RF and DNN algorithms are both less than 0.5 s, while it changes from 1.21 to 5.52 s for the DEDGO algorithm. Even though the DEDGO algorithm is a little inferior in this respect, it is still far faster than traditional iterative methods, which pre-configure a parameter combination, calculate the corresponding spectrum, and constantly adjust the parameters until the spectral error is less than the threshold, usually taking tens of minutes or even hours to design a sample [ 48 , 49 , 50 ]. Therefore, the DEDGO algorithm is confirmed to be an excellent method for the inverse design of TMDC-cavity heterojunctions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 14–16 ] Nonconformal optical elements with curved structures are essential components of nonconformal optical systems, [ 17–19 ] such as, curved surface imagers. [ 2,4,20–22 ] For example, inspired by the eyes of aquatic animals, Kim et al. developed a miniaturized wide‐field‐of‐view camera by integrating a monocentric lens and hemispherical silicon nanorod photodiode array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%