2020
DOI: 10.32604/cmc.2020.011416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent Cloud Based Heart Disease Prediction System Empowered with Supervised Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dataset was randomly divided into training (70% of the samples, 105,971) and validation (30% of the samples, 45,417). Various statistical parameters such as accuracy, misclassification rate (MCR), selectivity, recall, precision, false positive rate, false omission rate (FOR), false discovery rate (FDR), F 0.5 score and F 1 score are considered for investigating the performance of the proposed HSPS-WFML model [43][44][45].…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset was randomly divided into training (70% of the samples, 105,971) and validation (30% of the samples, 45,417). Various statistical parameters such as accuracy, misclassification rate (MCR), selectivity, recall, precision, false positive rate, false omission rate (FOR), false discovery rate (FDR), F 0.5 score and F 1 score are considered for investigating the performance of the proposed HSPS-WFML model [43][44][45].…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, devices such as the Amazfit Band 1S (PPG and single-lead ECG) [ 30 ], the HealthyPiV3 biosensors [ 31 ], or Polar H7 HR monitor [ 32 ] have been utilized. A few research groups have even built their own wearable ECG recording prototypes [ 33 , 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Cardiovascular Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khan et al [16] applied various methods, namely DNNs, RF, voting, variation autoencoders, and stacking ML classifiers, for handling unfair datasets to develop a dynamic system using the most current intrusion detection dataset [17]. The efficiency of the sampling techniques was tested.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%