2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301001.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligence Predicts Health and Longevity, but Why?

Abstract: Large epidemiological studies of almost an entire population in Scotland have found that intelligence (as measured by an IQ-type test) in childhood predicts substantial differences in adult morbidity and mortality, including deaths from cancers and cardiovascular diseases. These relations remain significant after controlling for socioeconomic variables. One possible, partial explanation of these results is that intelligence enhances individuals' care of their own health because it represents learning, reasonin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
372
1
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 532 publications
(403 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
14
372
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether measured in childhood or adulthood, intelligence is predictive for the social status of occupation and income (correlation of 0.51 and 0.31, respectively) (Judge, Higgins, Thoresen & Barrick, 1999). Indirectly, the relationship between intelligence and access to resources is confirmed by studies that have shown the level of general intelligence to be correlated with offspring survival rates (Čvorović, Rushton & Tenjevic, 2008) and life span (Gottfredson & Deary, 2004;Rushton, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Whether measured in childhood or adulthood, intelligence is predictive for the social status of occupation and income (correlation of 0.51 and 0.31, respectively) (Judge, Higgins, Thoresen & Barrick, 1999). Indirectly, the relationship between intelligence and access to resources is confirmed by studies that have shown the level of general intelligence to be correlated with offspring survival rates (Čvorović, Rushton & Tenjevic, 2008) and life span (Gottfredson & Deary, 2004;Rushton, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The focus on older participants may in part be due to the assumption that deficits in executive control and inhibition are central determinants of age-related cognitive decline in general (e.g., Hasher, Stoltzfus, Zacks, & Rypma, 1991;West, 1996). Improvements in fluid abilities are a common aim of cognitive training procedures because of their strong association with scholastic success (e.g., Deary, Strand, Smith, & Fernandes, 2007), health, and longevity (Gottfredson & Deary, 2004). Tasks of inductive and deductive reasoning (n = 10) are central to fluid cognitive abilities (Cattell, 1972) and given "the difficulties of inducing transfer effects to reasoning ability following working memory training, an alternative approach is to train directly on tasks that load highly on reasoning ability."…”
Section: Study Sample Overview Training Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, low intelligence is considered a risk factor for DM2 and a range of other chronic conditions, possibly in part because such individuals may be more inclined to engage in adverse health behaviours that increase the risk of disease (32). Therefore, relatively lower intelligence could be considered an important mechanism underlying the cognitive deficits observed both in the present study and in other studies which have observed DM2-related cognitive deficits, and the between-group difference in NART scores should not detract from the important observation that face recognition is impaired in DM2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%