1972
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1972.tb02071.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intellectual Realism in Children's Drawings of a Familiar Object With Distinctive Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
6

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
39
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the author did not use the drawing method, which is commonly used in the relevant literature, but analyzed the written responses of the students instead because they thought students might not be able to depict all their knowledge in drawings, which would reduce the reliability of the analysis. The relevant literature includes many discussions of children's drawings of either what they know or have seen (Beal & Arnold, 1990;Freeman & Janikoun, 1972). This means that it is difficult to determine whether children really know that subject or not by analyzing their drawings, and there might be differences in figures because of mental images (see.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the author did not use the drawing method, which is commonly used in the relevant literature, but analyzed the written responses of the students instead because they thought students might not be able to depict all their knowledge in drawings, which would reduce the reliability of the analysis. The relevant literature includes many discussions of children's drawings of either what they know or have seen (Beal & Arnold, 1990;Freeman & Janikoun, 1972). This means that it is difficult to determine whether children really know that subject or not by analyzing their drawings, and there might be differences in figures because of mental images (see.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freeman and Janikoun (1972), for example, found that most young children when asked to draw a cup in front of them that was turned so that the handle was not visible to them nevertheless included the handle in their drawing, thus demonstrating a canonical bias towards the distinguishing feature. Such features, with the same kind of information load, are characteristic of Paleolithic art.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ono mora da prizove i aktivno obrađuje konceptualne i percipirane komponente prizora koje želi da predstavi, ali i da inkorporira percipirane delove u adekvatne grafičke sheme. Takođe, mora da konstantno prati i unapred planira kako će prostorno koordinisati i rasporediti grafičke elemente na papir da bi postiglo što realističniji izgled scene u kojoj akter vrši određenu aktivnost (Freeman & Janikoun, 1972).…”
Section: тAbela 5 -Rezultati Procene Reprezentacije Akcije Kod Dece Punclassified