Intellectual Property Protection in Additive Layer Manufacturing

Yampolskiy, Mark; Andel, Todd R.; McDonald, J. Todd; Glisson, William Bradley; Yasinsac, Alec

doi:10.1145/2689702.2689709

Cited by 64 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Yamploskiy, et al, [30] express a need to expand intellectual property protection beyond the 3D model and incorporate all 3D printing parameters involved in the printing process. This is due to the unique effects printing parameters have on the structural properties of the printed object.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implications of Malicious 3D Printer Firmware

Moore

Glisson

Yampolskiy

2017

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implications of Malicious 3D Printer Firmware

Moore

Glisson

Yampolskiy

2017

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For AM, two major security threats identified in the research literature are intellectual property theft [16][17][18][19][20] and sabotage attacks [2,[6][7][8]. These threats are also present in composite materials.…”

Section: Threat Model and Focus Of The Papermentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimal sabotage attack on composite material parts

Ranabhat

Clements

Gatlin

et al. 2019

International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Confidentiality Work in [102] describes methods to maintain the confidentiality of the designs and uses 3D printing as a method for validation. Standards such as ISO/ASTM 52915 describe a framework for sharing design information for 3D printing.…”

Section: Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Manufacturing Supply Chain and Product Lifecycle Security in the Era of Industry 4.0

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The next generation of smart manufacturing systems will incorporate various recent enabling technologies. These technologies will aid in ushering the era of the fourth industrial revolution. They will make the supply chain and the product lifecycle of the manufacturing system efficient, decentralized, and well-connected. However, these technologies have various security issues and, when integrated in the supply chain and the product lifecycle of manufacturing systems, can pose various challenges for maintaining the security requirements such as confidentiality, integrity, and availability. In this paper, we will present the various trends and advances in the security of the supply chain and product lifecycle of the manufacturing system while highlighting the roles played by the major enabling components of Industry 4.0.

show abstract

Intellectual Property Protection in Additive Layer Manufacturing

Cited by 64 publications

References 27 publications

Implications of Malicious 3D Printer Firmware

Implications of Malicious 3D Printer Firmware

Optimal sabotage attack on composite material parts

Manufacturing Supply Chain and Product Lifecycle Security in the Era of Industry 4.0

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About