Intellectual property management system: Develop and self-assess using IPM model

Gargate, Gouri; Momaya, Kirankumar S.

doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2018.01.005

Cited by 19 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An interesting feature is the ability for businesses to ask for custom programming. This allows them to be able to have specific needs addressed, and confirms the ideas put forth by Gargate and Momaya [22] that a solution needs to make sense to the end-users who will be implementing it, i.e., it must be suited to the environment it is being created for. Inteum is, like TM Cloud [30], a widely used solution in the market.…”

Section: Review Of Available Sw Solutionssupporting

confidence: 62%

“…Our review also noted Gargate and Momaya's [22] approach, which was focused on developing countries, where IPs are either not recognized or not managed properly because of lax or inadequate legal structures. Here, MaxVal Group's Symphony [37] may prove to be extremely useful because its easy-to-use interface connects users with global patent information.…”

Section: Research Articles Vs Available Ip Management Sw Solutionsmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Gargate and Momaya [22] created an IPM model that could be used to create and analyze the system being created. The study looked at the gaps that organizations at times have to work with, specifically when it comes to developing countries that may not enjoy the same smooth legal proceedings as developed countries.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Review of Available SW Solutions for Intellectual Property Management Systems from the Perspective of Open Innovation

Krejcar

Frischer

Hlavica

et al. 2020

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This piece of research is focused on providing a review of the software solutions that exist when it comes to mechanisms that govern the management of intellectual property. It takes a deeper look at requirements within the university transfer office domain. Universities are a genuine source of knowledge. They have been identified not just as knowledge hubs but also as the spaces where innovations are born. These innovations then make their way into the market through the different industries they serve, becoming products that gain the attention of actual consumers. Given the magnitude of the innovations being developed in different universities around the world, it is imperative that mechanisms for the safety of this knowledge also be put into place. The world has evolved into a knowledge economy, where knowledge is an asset and something that can create profitability. This means that not protecting the knowledge that is being created can only lead to a loss in the future. Managing intellectual property, therefore, is not only a matter of procedure but one of great importance. Solutions that are easily accessible, cost-effective, and time-effective are essential. Thus, the goal of this article is to provide an overview of existing software (SW) solutions suitable for managing technology and knowledge transfer at universities based on requirements from the technology transfer office at university and specified using the model of the whole process from inventor until patent office. University Technology Transfer (TT) is a bit different in comparison to TT at companies. This gap is shown in the article using modelling of process, states, and class diagrams of a university Technology Transfer Office (TTO). Based on process definition and TTO responsibilities, a review of available SW solutions is done for 10 selected examples, as well as a related literature analysis. Findings and implications are summarized at the end of article in the context of specific needs of a university TTO, while major implications are shown as a problem of priority definition of every university TTO, namely, in the sense of value of SW solutions for intellectual property (IP) management, reporting possibilities, and representing IP and know-how.

show abstract

Section: Review Of Available Sw Solutionssupporting

confidence: 62%

Section: Research Articles Vs Available Ip Management Sw Solutionsmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Review of Available SW Solutions for Intellectual Property Management Systems from the Perspective of Open Innovation

Krejcar

Frischer

Hlavica

et al. 2020

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A study by Teixeira and Ferreira (2018) in Portugal revealed that IP protection of assets will lead companies to gain a competitive advantage compared to those companies who do not register the assets of their companies. In India, Gargate and Momaya (2018) conducted exploratory research, and the results showed that inventors should take care of IP-related regulatory processes and other protocols or procedures for product market entry. Universities should also continue to review their IP policies and education among their staff, students, and even with their domestic and international collaborators (Payumo et al, 2014).…”

Section: Relationship Between Intellectual Property (Ip) Management and Commercializationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Commercialization of academic research: assessing the perception of academicians at a public university in Malaysia

Suhaimi

Halim

Hashim

2020

JARHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study examines the perception and attitudes of academicians regarding factors that influence the commercialization of university research.Design/methodology/approachThe data sample was drawn using a proportionate stratified sampling approach. A self-administered survey was used to obtain data regarding the perception of academicians on the factors that contribute to research commercialization. A total of 131 academicians completed the survey. Multiple regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses.FindingsThe results showed that two factors are significant and positively related with commercialization: the academician's behaviour and University-Industry collaboration. Surprisingly, the factors of innovativeness and Intellectual Property management did not have a significant relationship with commercialization.Research limitations/implicationsFor future work, researchers should conduct in-depth interviews with the executive management at research universities and at the Ministry of Education Malaysia to complement our quantitative survey. These decision-makers act as funding sources for commercialization and can provide richer evidence regarding important factors affecting commercialization. They can also provide insight on the issues that prevent the commercialization of research from becoming a reality.Originality/valueCommercialization of Malaysia's university research findings is a critical agenda item in the National Higher Education Strategic Plan. However, in Malaysia, the rate of commercialization of academic research is still unsatisfactory. This study provides important insights regarding intentions behind commercialization by depicting how factors of academic research (i.e. academician's behaviour, innovativeness, Intellectual Properties management, University-Industry collaboration) influence commercialization.

show abstract

“…Manufacturing of innovation products and use of innovation management achievements allow an enterprise to be a leader in the industry, create new markets and manufacture new products implementing key principles of the "new" economy. Managers of modern enterprises are aware of the importance of innovation activities for improving competitive capacity of enterprises (Gargate & Momaya, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intellectual Property Asset Assessment Methods

Urazova¹,

Kotelnikov²

2018

The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Intellectual property management system: Develop and self-assess using IPM model

Cited by 19 publications

References 8 publications

Review of Available SW Solutions for Intellectual Property Management Systems from the Perspective of Open Innovation

Review of Available SW Solutions for Intellectual Property Management Systems from the Perspective of Open Innovation

Commercialization of academic research: assessing the perception of academicians at a public university in Malaysia

Intellectual Property Asset Assessment Methods

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About