Intellectual property information. A case study of Questel-Orbit

Stock, Mechtild; Stock, Wolfgang G.

doi:10.3233/isu-2005-253-404

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Figure 17 shows the historical progress of the specific energy of lithium-ion batteries. References: 2015-Crabtree [237], 2020-Dominko [238] 2020-Tesla [239] The red and blue triangles in Figure 17 refer to the data from recent review articles, where neither the battery chemistry nor battery formats were differentiated. It is worth noting that in thirty years since their first commercial introduction LIBs specific energy increased by a factor of 3.75.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Flow batteries with solid energy boosters

Tolmachev

Starodubceva²

2022

J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adding solid electroactive materials as energy boosters to flow battery tanks provides a path to electrical energy storing systems with unprecedently high specific energy and specific power, that can solve the needs of both automotive and stationary energy storage markets. This work reviews the physical and chemical principles behind this new class of flow batteries, the history of this technology, and the most promising research directions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Figure 17. Specific energy of lithium-ion batteries (various formats and chemistries) vs. production year.References: 2015-Crabtree[237], 2020-Dominko[238] 2020-Tesla[239] …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Flow batteries with solid energy boosters

Tolmachev

Starodubceva²

2022

J. Electrochem. Sci. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We will analyze and compare products by DIALOG (Derriks, 2005;Kulp, 1984;Stock & Stock 2003a, 2003b, Esp@cenet by the European Patent Office (EPO; McKierman, 2001;Melvin, 2002;Pilch, 2005), products by Questel-Orbit (Dickens, 2005;Gladden, 2002;Kulp, 1984;Stock & Stock, 2004b, 2005b and STN International (Stock & Stock, 2003c, 2003dfor Chemical Abstracts Service [CAS], see Shively & Williams, 2004). How do these specialized information companies secure their success?…”

Section: Research Agendamentioning

confidence: 99%

Intellectual property information: A comparative analysis of main information providers

Stock¹,

Stock

2006

J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After modeling expert user needs with regard to intellectual property information, we analyze and compare the main providers in this specific information area (Thomson DIALOG, Esp@cenet by the European Patent Office, Questel-Orbit, and STN International) in terms of system content and system functionality. The key question is whether the main providers are able to satisfy these expert user needs. For patent information, some special retrieval features such as chemical structure search (including Markush search), patent family references and citations search, biosequence search, and basic informetric functionality such as ranking, mapping, and visualization of information flows are realized. Considering the results of information science research, the practice of patent information shows unexhausted improvement opportunities (e.g., the application of bibliographic patent coupling and co-patent-citation for mapping patents, patent assignees, and technology specialties). For trademark search, users need multiple truncated search (realized) as well as phonetic search and image retrieval (not realized yet).

show abstract