Untitled

Huntington, Paul; Nicholas, David; Jamali, Hamid R.; Tenopir, Carol

doi:10.1002/asi.v57:13

Cited by 53 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 368 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this case the opportunity sensing helps firm to avoid two types of error in NPD projects, which are: (1) the potential failure project that is preceded because managers have ignored risk signals, and (2) the potential success project that is prematurely terminated because of lacking evidences for it success (Bonabeau, Bodick, & Armstrong, 2008). At the end, the need to create alignment will be reduced when the fit between new product and market need is improved (Pan, Pan, & Hsieh, 2006). Since continuously sensing the market and seizing the right capability is the way for sustainable competitive advantage (Harreld, O'Reilly, & Tushman, 2007), the cycle will be repeated again once the alignment is affected by new market dynamism (See Region A in Figure 1).…”

Section: Exploitation Capabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Managing Technology and Change in New Product Development (NPD): A Dynamic Capability Perspective

Zaidi

Othman²

2014

IJARBSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper derives from the perspective of dynamic capability (DC) that foresees sustainable competitive advantage can be achieved through firm's ability to continuously create alignment between new product development (NPD) and market need. By highlighting the inter-related issues, and with thorough critical review on the relevant literature, this paper proposes a conceptual framework for easy explanation of the concept. As a result, this paper contributes to better understanding of DC concept for managing technology and change in NPD. The potential areas for future studies are highlighted at the end of discussion.JEL Classification: O31, O32, O33

show abstract

Section: Exploitation Capabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Managing Technology and Change in New Product Development (NPD): A Dynamic Capability Perspective

Zaidi

Othman²

2014

IJARBSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Katz and Hicks (1997) studied how the average number of citations per paper varies with different types of collaborations. See also the works of van Raan (1997), Sooryamoorthy (2009) and Birnholtz (2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometrics for collaboration works

Rossi,

Strumia,

Torre

2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An important issue in bibliometrics is the weighting of co-authorship in the production of scientific collaborations, which are becoming the standard modality of research activity in many disciplines. The problem is especially relevant in the field of high-energy physics, where collaborations reach 3000 authors, but it can no longer be ignored also in other domains, like medicine or biology. We present theoretical and numerical arguments in favour of weighing the individual contributions as 1/N α aut where N aut is the number of co-authors. When counting citations we suggest the exponent α ≈ 1, that corresponds to fractional counting. When counting the number of papers we suggest α ≈ 1/3 − 1/2, with the former (latter) value more appropriate for larger (smaller) collaborations.

show abstract