2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4952245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrators for particle in cell methods: Comparison and applications

Abstract: In this paper, we present different types of integrators for electromagnetic particle-in-cell (PIC) methods. While the integrator is an important tool of the PIC methods, it is necessary to characterize the different conservation approaches of the integrators, e.g. symplecticity, energy-or charge-conservation. We discuss the different principles, e.g. composition, filtering, explicit and implicit ideas.While, particle in cell methods are well-studied, the combination between the different parts, i.e. pusher, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semi-implicit scheme in velocity space preserving the asymptotic limit of the guiding centre approximation was also investigated by Filbet & Rodrigues (2015). Geiser & Frederik (2016) discussed the merit of several integrators used in electromagnetic PIC simulations, like the explicit and implicit Boris algorithm and a cyclotronic integrator. An explicit time-reversible cyclotronic integrator has been derived in Patacchini & Hutchinson (2009) to avoid a fine resolution of the Larmor frequency on some field configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semi-implicit scheme in velocity space preserving the asymptotic limit of the guiding centre approximation was also investigated by Filbet & Rodrigues (2015). Geiser & Frederik (2016) discussed the merit of several integrators used in electromagnetic PIC simulations, like the explicit and implicit Boris algorithm and a cyclotronic integrator. An explicit time-reversible cyclotronic integrator has been derived in Patacchini & Hutchinson (2009) to avoid a fine resolution of the Larmor frequency on some field configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%