2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of the calcium carbonate looping process into an existing pulverized coal-fired power plant for CO2 capture: Techno-economic and environmental evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This software was initially developed for the use of coal liquefaction research projects of the European Commission over the period since 1986 by the Energy Research Centre of the University of Ulster 23 . However, since its development, it has been used to provide a techno‐economic assessment for a wide range of industrial plant applications, most recently in References 24, 25.…”
Section: Modelling and Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This software was initially developed for the use of coal liquefaction research projects of the European Commission over the period since 1986 by the Energy Research Centre of the University of Ulster 23 . However, since its development, it has been used to provide a techno‐economic assessment for a wide range of industrial plant applications, most recently in References 24, 25.…”
Section: Modelling and Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific consumption of primary energy for CO 2 avoided (SPECCA) also shows better value for chemical looping in comparison to chemical scrubbing (gas-liquid absorption) by about 0.67 MJ/kg. All these technical and environmental benefits of the CaL-based decarbonization process translate into improved economic performance [35]. All economic indicators are in favor of the calcium looping option in comparison to the gas-liquid absorption as assessed decarbonization technologies-specific investment cost (reduced by about 25%), levelized cost of electricity (reduced by about 18%), and CO 2 avoided cost (reduced by about 36%).…”
Section: Coal-based Super-critical Combustion Power Plantsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The calcium looping process can be run most efficiently if integrated in power plants (e.g. coalfired), resulting in net efficiency penalties < 8 % [30], [632]- [636]. In Europe and other parts of the world, reliance on coal for power generation is expected to decrease significantly in the next decades as per governmental decisions, so it remains doubtful whether efforts will be made to retrofit existing power plants with a calcium looping process for CO2 capture.…”
Section: Enabling Co2 Capture On An Industrial Scalementioning
confidence: 99%